Simonson v. Typer
Decision Date | 04 December 1922 |
Docket Number | 5939. |
Citation | 285 F. 240 |
Parties | SIMONSON v. TYPER. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Roderick N. Matson, of Cheyenne, Wyo. (Clarence A. Swainson, of Cheyenne, Wyo., on the brief), for appellant.
H. C Brome, of Omaha, Neb. (Thomas M. Hyde, of Basin, Wyo., on the brief), for appellee.
Before LEWIS and KENYON, Circuit Judges, and YOUMANS, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree against Chauncey B. Typer, Clifford W. Axtell, John Z. Jones, and Lee Simonson foreclosing a mortgage given by Chauncey B. Typer to William Typer to secure an indebtedness of $5,000 upon certain lands in Hot Springs County, Wyo. William Typer was and had been at all times mentioned herein a citizen and resident of Ogle county, Ill., and the defendants were residents of Wyoming. The complaint alleged that the defendants Clifford W. Axtell John Z. Jones, and Lee Simonson claimed some interest in the real estate described in the mortgage, but that such interest or claim was inferior and subject to the lien of appellee's mortgage. The appellant, Lee Simonson answered, setting up two defenses, which he now claim were sustained by the evidence. The adverse decision of the court below as to these two defenses is assigned here as error. The first defense was that William Typer was made defendant in a suit in the district court of the Fifth judicial district in and for the county of Hot Springs, in the state of Wyoming, and that he in that suit was adjudged to have no right, title, interest, or equity in the real estate involved in that suit, which was the same real estate described in appellee's mortgage. This defense was based upon two propositions: (a) That in the suit in the state court referred to William Typer was served with summons outside the state of Wyoming, and that judgment by default was taken against him; and (b) that William Typer entered his appearance in the suit in the state court, and that after entering such appearance judgment by default was taken against him. The second defense was that William Typer had, prior to the time that Simonson obtained title to the real estate, released the mortgage he was then seeking to foreclose in the United States District Court. Simonson obtained title to the property through the judicial sale in the proceedings in the state court.
The record of the proceedings in that court were introduced in evidence. That record disclosed that a suit was brought in that court by John Z. Jones against Chauncey B. Typer to foreclose a mortgage upon the land involved in the suit in the court below. C. W. Axtell, who is the same as Clifford W. Axtell, was made a party defendant. Axtell was the attorney of Jones in bringing the suit. Axtell, acting as attorney for himself, filed an answer and cross-bill. William Typer and Frances B. Beldon were made defendants in the cross-bill. There was no allegation in the answer and cross-bill that William Typer was a nonresident of the state of Wyoming. The cross-bill sought foreclosure of a mortgage executed by Chauncey B. Typer to C. W. Axtell to secure an indebtedness of $15,000, and in addition thereto Axtell sought a judgment for $3,000 as an attorney's fee to himself, alleging that such fee was provided for in the mortgage. Axtell delivered to the clerk of the state court a praecipe for summons which reads as follows:
A summons was issued to the sheriff of Hot Springs county, Wyo., for Chauncey B. Typer, C. W. Axtell, William Typer, and Frances B. Beldon. The following summons was also issued by the clerk: 'The State of Wyoming, County of Hot Springs-- ss.:
On the back of this summons there appeared the following indorsement:
'In District Court Fifth Judicial District.
'The plaintiff will take judgment for the sum of $ . . ., together with interest thereon at the rate of . . . per cent. per annum, from the . . . day of . . ., A.D. 19 . . ., and costs of suit, if the defendant fail to answer.
There also appeared the following with reference to service:
'The State of Illinois, County of Ogle-- ss.:
'I hereby certify that I received the within summons on the 25th day of December, A.D. 1918, at 10 o'clock a.m., and I served the same by delivering a certified copy thereof, together with all the indorsements thereon, together with a copy of the answer and cross-petition of C. W. Axtell in said cause, to William Typer, the within name defendant, at Polo, Ogle county, Illinois, on the 26th day of December A.D. 1918.
'George D. Banning, Sheriff, 'By Sheridan N. Dobson, Deputy Sheriff.
Section 5623, Complied Statutes of Wyoming for 1920, is as follows:
Section 5627, Compiled Statutes of Wyoming for 1920, reads as follows:
* * * '
Section 5636, Compiled Statutes of Wyoming for 1920, reads as follows:
* * * '
Section 5638, Compiled Statutes of Wyoming for 1920, reads as follows:
Section 5641, Compiled Statutes of Wyoming for 1920, reads as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Bensberg v. Hartmann
... ... Brown, 9 Ark. 20; Hickey v. Forristal, 49 Ill ... 255; Porter v. Hill County, 33 S.W. 383; ... Hansford v. Tate, 56 S. E. (W. Va.) 372; Simonson v ... Typer, 285 F. 240 ... Taylor ... R. Young, John C. Vogel and Abbott, Fauntleroy, ... Cullen & Edwards for respondents ... ...
-
Stacey-Vorwerk Co. v. Buck
...insufficient under the statute. 5638, 5641 C. S. The statute must be followed precisely. Black on Judgments (2nd Ed.) Sec. 232; Simonson v. Typer, 285 F. 240, 245; Bank Lattimer, (Okla.) 149 P. 1099. The service being insufficient to confer jurisdiction of the res, the garnishee must be dis......
-
First Wyoming Bank, N. A., Rawlins v. Trans Mountain Sales & Leasing, Inc.
...is obsolete. Appellees also cite a case from the Eighth Circuit at a time when the Eighth Circuit included Wyoming. In Simonson v. Typer, 8 Cir., 285 F. 240, 245 (1922), the court, in interpreting Wyoming law, "To authorize service outside the state an affidavit must be filed showing that s......
-
Lonquest's Estate, In re
...and insufficient where no affidavit had been filed showing that such service could not be made within the State. Simonson v. Typer, 8 Cir., 285 F. 240, 244-245. Numerous cases indicate that statutes prescribing the manner of service of summons are mandatory and must be strictly pursued. Nel......