Simplicio v. National Scientific Personnel Bureau
Decision Date | 03 May 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 2938.,2938. |
Parties | Antonette SIMPLICIO, Appellant, v. NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC PERSONNEL BUREAU, INC., a domestic corporation, Appellee. |
Court | D.C. Court of Appeals |
John Paul Sullivan, Washington, D. C., with whom Dennis Collins, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.
Before HOOD, Chief Judge, QUINN, Associate Judge, and MYERS, Associate Judge of The Municipal Court for the District of Columbia, sitting by designation.
Appellant, a former employee of corporate appellee, brought this action for unpaid wages and for reimbursement of expenses incident to attending a convention out of the city in connection with her employment. Appellee counterclaimed for an alleged overpayment of wages and contended that appellant never incurred expenses for the trip and that she was paid her salary in stock of the corporation in lieu of money as provided for by an agreement between them. The trial judge found for the corporation on appellant's claims and for her on the counterclaim. From the judgment against her, appellant appeals.
Whether appellant was entitled to reimbursement for her travel expenses was a question of fact. She testified that while attending a convention in Chicago on behalf of the corporation she paid for her meals, her hotel room, and her fare home. Appellee's president testified she left the convention without paying her bills and that he and another employee, after waiting in vain for her, had to drive back to Washington without her. The trial judge resolved this issue against appellant, and we see no reason for disturbing his finding.
Whether the corporation had a contractual right to pay appellant's salary with shares of stock must be determined from the following evidence. After appellant had worked for the corporation about nine months, the parties entered into negotiations toward a contract which would define the terms of appellant's continued employment with the corporation and which contemplated that she would be accepted as an officer, stockholder and member of the Board of Directors, in exchange for which she would invest $5,000 for five shares of capital stock of the company. As the basis for its contention that there was an agreement that appellant would accept, under certain circumstances, shares of stock in the corporation in lieu of salary, appellee relies on a letter1 from appellant, pertinent excerpts from which are quoted below:
The trial judge found that by this letter the appellant had contracted to accept, under certain conditions, stock in lieu of salary. We disagree. The language of the letter, taken as a whole, clearly indicates that the appellant did not intend to be bound to do so until a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
RDP Techs., Inc. v. Cambi As
...binding contract, because the parties had contemplated a later writing memorializing their agreement. See Simplicio v. Nat'l Scientific Pers. Bureau, Inc., 180 A.2d 500, 502 (D.C.1962). Other courts have similarly concluded that preliminary documents exchanged between the parties do not con......
-
Sellers v. Anthem Life Ins. Co.
... ... 52-11 at 2; ECF No. 52-12 at ... 3; cf. Simplicio v. Nat'l Scientific Pers. Bureau, ... Inc. , 180 A.2d ... ...
-
Jack Baker, Inc. v. Office Space Dev.
...unless the evidence presented clearly indicates that they intended to be bound at that point. See Simplicio v. National Scientific Personnel Bureau, Inc., 180 A.2d 500, 502 (D.C.1962) ("the language of the letter, taken as a whole, clearly indicates that the appellant did not intend to be b......
-
Novecon Ltd. v.Bulgarian-Am. Enterprise Fund, 97-7178
...could be accepted ... without the necessity of a formal written document covering all the terms." Simplicio v. National Scientific Personnel Bureau, Inc., 180 A.2d 500, 502 (D.C. 1962). As an alternative to its breach of contract claim, Novecon contends that it is entitled to relief on eith......