Simpson v. Fowles
Decision Date | 19 June 1975 |
Citation | 272 Or. 342,536 P.2d 499 |
Parties | Rolfe M. SIMPSON and Franklin H. Simpson, Jr., Appellants, v. Robert W. FOWLES et al., Respondents. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Darrell E. Bewley, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Francis F. Yunker, Portland, and Burton R. Hendershott and Emily Lynn Knupp, Aloha.
Bernard B. Brink, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Mervin W. Brink and Brink & Moore, Hillsboro.
This is a suit to enjoin defendants from interfering with plaintiffs' use of an easement over defendants' land. Defendants seek a decree quieting title in them by extinguishing the easement. The trial court found that the easement had been extinguished by adverse use. Plaintiffs appeal.
Plaintiffs own the dominant estate consisting of a 20-acre tract of land which adjoins defendants' land on the north. Plaintiffs' predecessor in interest acquired an easement of way along the northerly line of the servient estate to be used for the purpose of ingress and egress to the 20-acre parcel. The easement was created in 1908. The servient estate has been used for the last 35 years as a filbert orchard. The branches of the filbert trees extend over the easement to such an extent that it cannot be used for the movement of vehicles without damaging the trees. The nature of defendants' use and the extent to which the easement was interfered with is described in a letter opinion by the trial court, which reads in part, as follows:
orchard have been planted on and near the easement and have grown to the size where they extend fully across. This condition, together with cultivation activities around and under the trees by defendants, have been observed by the plaintiffs for the period of time in question. * * *
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. Muellner
...owner's planting of trees near right-of-way that "was overgrown like a wilderness" did not extinguish way); but see Simpson v. Fowles, 272 Or. 342, 344, 536 P.2d 499 (1975) (easement extinguished by maintenance of filbert orchard on servient estate, obstructing easement, for thirty-five Mor......
-
Faulconer v. Williams
...of defendants. For the reasons that follow, we agree. An express easement may be extinguished by adverse possession. Simpson v. Fowles, 272 Or. 342, 344, 536 P.2d 499 (1975). For that to occur, all the elements of adverse possession must be shown by clear and convincing evidence. See Thomps......
-
Central Oregon Fabricators, Inc. v. Hudspeth
...of adverse possession. The servient estate can adversely possess a right to use the property away from the dominant holder. Simpson v. Fowles, 272 Or. 342 (1975). The party must show that possession is (1) open, notorious and a hostile claim of right as against others; (2) continuous; (3) e......
- Oregon Broadcasting Co. v. Department of Revenue