Sinclair Refining Co. v. Winder, 3773

Decision Date10 November 1960
Docket NumberNo. 3773,3773
CitationSinclair Refining Co. v. Winder, 340 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Ct. App. 1960)
PartiesSINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, Appellant, v. Clark Virgil WINDER, Appellee.
CourtTexas Civil Court of Appeals

James W. Yancy, Jr., Sam L. Sterrett, Jr., Houston, for appellant.

Saub, Walker & Hammond, Houston, for appellee.

WILSON, Justice.

Plaintiff alleged he was employed by a railroad engaged in switching operations on appellant's premises, when he stepped on a pile of slag on appellant's tracks; that he fell on the track and a car rolled over his finger.Defendant's pleading was a general denial.

Plaintiff admitted, and the jury found, that he knew of the unsafe condition of the track.The jury found defendant's negligence in maintaining the pile of slag was a proximate cause of his damages.We think the record establishes as a matter of law that the condition was open, obvious, and known to both parties.Appellant says it was therefore entitled to judgment.Appellee contends that since there was evidence to establish that at the time of his injury he was attempting to halt unattended cars rolling downhill under a humanitarian impulse to prevent injury to workers who were unaware of the danger, the doctrine of volenti non fit injuria should not apply.

Whether there is a duty on the owner of premises to take precautions against injury to an invitee from dangers of which the latter is aware, depends on whether the invitee 'voluntarily encounters' the dangerous condition 'of his own free will and as a result of intelligent choice.'In determining the owner's duty, the conduct of the invitee must be looked to.The owner's knowledge and appreciation is only the initial inquiry.If this is established, knowledge and appreciation by the invitee must be shown.There yet...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
18 cases
  • Halepeska v. Callihan Interests, Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 31 d3 Julho d3 1963
    ...recover. There may be some exceptions, such as where the plaintiff is motivated by humanitarianism of rescue impulses. Sinclair Refining Company v. Winder, 340 S.W.2d 503, Tex.Civ.App.1960, writ refused. And see Restatement of Torts, § Another basic difference is that in contributory neglig......
  • Messick v. General Motors Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 11 d2 Julho d2 1972
    ...recover. There may be some exceptions, such as where the plaintiff is motivated by humanitarianism or rescue impulses. Sinclair Refining Company v. Winder, 340 S.W.2d 503, Tex. Civ.App.1960, writ refused. And see Restatement of Torts, § We now turn to a consideration of whether Messick's st......
  • Greenwood v. Lowe Chemical Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Civil Court of Appeals
    • 24 d3 Abril d3 1968
    ...the circumstances decedent had a full understanding and appreciation of the extent of the danger. As said in the case of Sinclair Refining Co. v. Winder, 340 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.Civ.App.), writ 'Whether there is a duty on the owner of premises to take precautions against injury to an invitee fr......
  • Amoco Chemicals Corp. v. Sutton
    • United States
    • Texas Civil Court of Appeals
    • 28 d4 Abril d4 1977
    ...of law, nor does he assume the risk incident thereto unless he acts in a rash, imprudent or negligent manner. Sinclair Ref. Co. v. Winder, Tex.Civ.App., 340 S.W.2d 503, wr. ref.; Keystone-Fleming Transport, Inc. v. City of Tahoka, Tex.Civ.App., 315 S.W.2d 656, wr. ref. n. r. e.; Reddick v. ......
  • Get Started for Free