Sinclair v. Spatocco, 71-1905.
| Decision Date | 23 February 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 71-1905.,71-1905. |
| Citation | 452 F.2d 1213 |
| Parties | James SINCLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gloria Ella SPATOCCO, alias Gloria E. Reed, et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
James Sinclair in pro. per.
John K. Duncan, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Before MERRILL, BROWNING and CHOY, Circuit Judges.
:
Dismissal by the District Court was not error.
Appellant's allegations against his attorney do not amount to violation of his civil rights, giving rise to federal jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1985. Services performed by an attorney in connection with a lawsuit do not constitute action under color of state law. Dyer v. Rosenberg, 434 F.2d 648 (9th Cir. 1970).
As to the remaining claims, the finding of the District Court that appellant was a citizen of California was not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, diversity of citizenship did not exist. Nor was it error to refuse to defer determination until the issue could be submitted to a jury. The trial court has discretion to determine the jurisdictional facts itself. Har-Pen Truck Lines, Inc. v. Mills, 378 F.2d 705 (5th Cir. 1967) ; Seideman v. Hamilton, 275 F.2d 224 (3d Cir. 1960). See Gilbert v. David, 235 U.S. 561, 568, 35 S.Ct. 164, 59 L.Ed. 360 (1915). See also, 5 J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 38.36 (1971). We find no abuse of discretion under the facts of this case.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Willis v. Lappin
...issue, resolving factual disputes if necessary. Berardinelli v. Castle & Cooke, Inc., 587 F.2d 37 (9th Cir. 1978); Sinclair v. Spatocco, 452 F.2d 1213 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 886, 93 S.Ct. 102 (1972). It is Defendants' burden to show that the DFE applies to shield them from ......
-
Thornhill Pub. Co., Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp.
...v. Castle & Cooke, Inc., 587 F.2d 37 (9 Cir. 1978); Mortensen v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, supra, 549 F.2d at 891; Sinclair v. Spatocco, 452 F.2d 1213 (9 Cir. 1971), Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 886, 93 S.Ct. 102, 34 L.Ed.2d 142 (1972); Appelt v. Whitty, 286 F.2d 135 (7 Cir. 1961). The standa......
-
Gozzi v. Cnty. of Monterey
...does not bestow any special state-possessed powers such that attorneys are deemed to have acted under color of law. Sinclair v. Spatocco, 452 F.2d 1213, 1213 (9th Cir. 1971) ("Services performed by an attorney in connection with a lawsuit do not constitute action under color of state law.")......
-
U.S. ex rel. Simmons v. Zibilich
...1972), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 950, 93 S.Ct. 3015, 37 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1973); Thomas v. Howard, 455 F.2d 228 (3 Cir. 1972); Sinclair v. Spatocco, 452 F.2d 1213 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 886, 93 S.Ct. 102, 34 L.Ed.2d 142 (1972); Dyer v. Rosenberg, 434 F.2d 648 (9 Cir. 1970); French v. Cor......