Singer Sewing Mach. Co. v. Lang

Decision Date07 April 1925
Citation186 Wis. 530,203 N.W. 399
PartiesSINGER SEWING MACH. CO. v. LANG.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Circuit Court, Milwaukee County; Walter Schinz, Judge.

Suit by the Singer Sewing Machine Company against Charles R. Lang. From order of circuit court affirming an order of the court commissioner adjudging defendant in contempt, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant by service of a summons. It then proceeded to examine the defendant under section 4096, Stats., upon an affidavit made for and upon its behalf; it appearing therefrom that the plaintiff is the manufacturer of the Singer sewing machine and that it sells its product directly to the consumer through agents appointed by it in all parts of the country; that the title to sewing machines furnished to its agents is retained in the plaintiff, and the agents are required to sell said machines direct to the consumer at a price and upon terms fixed by the plaintiff; that the plaintiff furnishes to its various agents so appointed various advertising material, literature, signs, and insignias, each of which bears upon its face the trade-mark of the plaintiff, consisting of a large capital S, within which is printed the figure of a female sitting at a sewing machine, which trade-mark is copyrighted by the plaintiff and is its sole property; that no persons other than its duly appointed agents are authorized to display any of its advertising matter, signs, symbols, or designs; that plaintiff causes each of the sewing machines manufactured by it to be identified and marked by a serial number stamped into the metallic part of each of said machines, and that plaintiff maintains accurate records of the serial number of each machine and to whom the same is intrusted as its agents for sale and distribution; that many of said machines are sold through plaintiff's agents to the consumer and user thereof on time payment plans, said machines being intrusted, upon the payment of a certain nominal amount, into the possession of the user and prospective purchaser thereof, the said plaintiff retaining ownership and title thereto; and that in the event the person receiving possession thereof fails to pay therefor according to the contract under which the same is purchased by him, the said plaintiff can repossess itself of said machine, and trace the same and fix its identity by means of and through the serial number stamped upon each sewing machine manufactured by said plaintiff.

That notwithstanding the fact that the defendant has never been appointed by the plaintiff as its agent for the sale of its machines, nor authorized to display its advertising material, signs, trade-marks, and insignias, the said defendant advertises that he is selling and can sell to the user and consumer said plaintiff's new sewing machines at a price less than that which its duly authorized agents are permitted to sell the same for, and that he is enabled so to do because he obtained said machines in an unlawful and fraudulent manner, from persons having no title thereto, for the reason that said machines have not been paid for to said plaintiff, and are its property; that the serial numbers of the machines so sold by the defendant are defaced, altered, and changed so that said machines cannot be followed and identified by the plaintiff, all to its great damage and injury.

That the general nature, object, and purpose of the action is to enjoin and restrain the above-named defendant from holding himself out as an agent of said plaintiff corporation, and from holding himself out as a person duly authorized to sell new Singer sewing machines for and on behalf of said plaintiff, from selling said plaintiff's sewing machines as the property of said defendant, from selling said machines at a lower price than that fixed by said plaintiff, and to enjoin and restrain defendant from using, displaying, or exhibiting any of its advertising matter and to deliver the same up to said plaintiff, to compel an accounting and to collect damages for the wrongful acts set forth, and to restrain the defendant from mutilating, defacing, or altering the serial numbers on each and every of the Singer sewing machines manufactured by the plaintiff, and from selling new Singer sewing machines until he is so employed and authorized by plaintiff; that discovery is necessary in order to enable the plaintiff to plead, and that the points on which such discovery is desired are as follows:

(1) The person, or persons, from and through whom the defendant obtains, and has obtained, the new Singer sewing machines in his possession, and under his control, and the new Singer sewing machines manufactured by said plaintiff, heretofore sold by said defendant, together with the names and addresses of the persons to whom machines were sold, and the price paid by such persons.

(2) The serial numbers of the respective Singer sewing machines manufactured by said plaintiff now in the defendant's possession, or heretofore sold by him, or his agents, in the city of Milwaukee.

(3) The person, or persons, from whom and through whom he obtained the various Singer sewing machine advertising matter, trade-marks, trade-names, or designs, in possession of the defendant and used and displayed by him in connection with his business.

(4) The price which the said defendant pays for the new Singer sewing machines manufactured by said plaintiff, in his...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Continental Management, Inc. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Claims Court
    • 17 Diciembre 1975
    ...denied, 225 So.2d 523 (Fla.1969); Hirsch v. Schwartz, 87 N.J.Super. 382, 209 A.2d 635, 640 (App.Div.1965); Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Lang, 186 Wis. 530, 203 N.W. 399, 401 (1925); Restatement (Second) of Agency § 312 (1958). In nearly unbroken succession, courts have declared that victimi......
  • E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 6 Diciembre 1927
    ...found: Martens v. Reilly, 109 Wis. 464, 470, 84 N. W. 840;McLennan v. Church, 163 Wis. 411, 419, 158 N. W. 73;Singer Sewing Mach. Co. v. Lang, 186 Wis. 530, 536, 203 N. W. 399;Exchange Bakery & Restaurant Co. v. Rifkin, 245 N. Y. 260, 157 N. E. 130;Lamb v. Cheney & Son, 227 N. Y. 418, 421, ......
  • Bender v. Hearst Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 11 Febrero 1959
    ...had persuaded Reidl to transfer distribution to him. See, e.g., E. L. Hustings Co. v. Coca Cola Co., supra; Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Lang, 1925, 186 Wis. 530, 203 N.W. 399. Finally, as recently as 1956 the Wisconsin Supreme Court has held that the "malice" which will subject a defendant......
  • Henry G. Meigs, Inc. v. Empire Petroleum Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 11 Enero 1960
    ...v. Swan, 1906, 128 Wis. 321, 107 N.W. 336; Durbrow Commission Co. v. Donner, 1930, 201 Wis. 175, 229 N.W. 635; Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Lang, 1925, 186 Wis. 530, 203 N.W. 399, and Johnson v. Shell Oil Co., 1957, 274 Wis. 375, 80 N.W.2d 426, to demonstrate that the Wisconsin Statute is n......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT