Singh v. New York
| Decision Date | 10 November 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. 08–165.,08–165. |
| Citation | 555 U.S. 1011,172 L.Ed.2d 429,129 S.Ct. 570 |
| Parties | Tejpal SINGH, petitioner, v. NEW YORK. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
People v. Boley
...46 N.Y.2d 154, 167, 412 N.Y.S.2d 874, 385 N.E.2d 612;People v. Singh, 47 A.D.3d 733, 734, 849 N.Y.S.2d 606,cert. denied 555 U.S. 1011, 129 S.Ct. 570, 172 L.Ed.2d 429). Here the defendant failed to satisfy the test because he failed to establish that the declarant was unavailable to testify ......
-
People v. Simmons
...People v. Toussaint, 74 A.D.3d 846, 902 N.Y.S.2d 165; People v. Singh, 47 A.D.3d 733, 734, 849 N.Y.S.2d 606, cert. denied 555 U.S. ––––, 129 S.Ct. 570, 172 L.Ed.2d 429). Here, the Supreme Court properly declined to admit a statement offered by the defendant because the statement, made by a ......
-
People v. Simmons
...People v. Toussaint, 74 A.D.3d 846, 902 N.Y.S.2d 165; People v. Singh, 47 A.D.3d 733, 734, 849 N.Y.S.2d 606, cert. denied--- U.S. ----, 129 S.Ct. 570, 172 L.Ed.2d 429). Here, the Supreme Court properly declined to admit into evidence a statement offered by the defendant because the statemen......