Singh v. Superintending School Committee
Decision Date | 27 September 1984 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 83-0160 P. |
Citation | 593 F. Supp. 1315 |
Parties | Balwant SINGH, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDING SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF the CITY OF PORTLAND, et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Maine |
David J. Corson, Yarmouth, Me., for plaintiff.
Hugh G.E. MacMahon, Harry R. Pringle, Portland, Me., for defendants.
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
A hearing has been had herein before the Honorable D. Brock Hornby, United States Magistrate, upon the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment. The United States Magistrate has considered the written arguments of counsel upon said motion, and has filed with this Court on June 8, 1984, his Report and Recommended Decision on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment, in which he recommends as follows:
Defendants timely filed objections "to the extent that the Magistrate has recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment be denied." Defendants' Written Objections to Report and Recommended Decision of Magistrate, at 1. The written objections thereafter set out specific objections to each of the first six actions recommended by the Magistrate as enumerated hereinabove.
SO ORDERED.
APPENDIX A
In their objections to the Magistrate's Report the Defendants also assert that "Plaintiff's claims for compensatory and punitive damages under the Maine Human Rights Act, as well as under Title VII, should be stricken." Defendants' Written Objections to Report and Recommended Decision of Magistrate, at 2. The record does not disclose that these arguments were made before the Magistrate. Defendants' written memorandum to the Magistrate argued in only seven lines that the Plaintiff's compensatory and punitive...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fairview Tp., York County, Com. of Pa. v. U.S. E.P.A.
......----, 104 S.Ct. 392, 78 L.Ed.2d 336 (1983); Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied sub ......
-
Bowen v. Blaine
...parties must take before the Magistrate, "not only their `best shot,' but all of their shots." Singh v. Superintending Sch. Comm. of Portland, 593 F.Supp. 1315, 1318 (D.Me.1984). This Bowen did not do, and, on this alternative ground, the court need not consider his claim ...
-
U.S. v. Gabriel
...must take before the magistrate, `not only their "best shot" but all of their shots.'")(quoting Singh v. Superintending Sch. Comm., 593 F.Supp. 1315, 1318 (D.Me.1984)). Here, the Government presented evidence before the Magistrate Judge that it later determined was incorrect. Relying on the......
-
Gasparotto v. United States, CASE NO.: 16-22306-CV-SEITZ
...shot but all of the shots.'" Borden v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 836 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1987)(quoting Singh v. Superintending Sch. Comm., 593 F.Supp. 1315, 1318 (D.Me. 1984)). 8. Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 133 S.Ct. 2276, 186 L.Ed.2d 438 (2013). In Descamps, the Supreme......