Singleton v. Cannizzaro

Docket Number19-30197
Decision Date21 April 2020
Plaintiffs allege that for years, prosecutors at the Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office, under the direction of District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro, used fake "subpoenas" to pressure crime victims and witnesses to meet with them. The Fifth Circuit held that (1) at this early, motion to dismiss stage, the individual defendants are not entitled to absolute immunity for plaintiffs' subpoena-related state-law claims and (2) the court lacked jurisdiction to consider the merits of plaintiffs'...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
36 cases
  • Spec's Family Partners, Ltd. v. Nettles
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • August 25, 2020
    ...734 (5th Cir. 2020). "In determining immunity, we accept the allegations of the plaintiffs’ complaint as true." Singleton v. Cannizzaro , 956 F.3d 773, 779 (5th Cir. 2020) (cleaned up). We review the district court's decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction for abuse of discretion......
  • Wearry v. Foster
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • May 3, 2022
    ...from denials of absolute prosecutorial immunity involving federal and Louisiana state law claims. See, e.g., Singleton v. Cannizzaro , 956 F.3d 773 (5th Cir. 2020). We review a district court's denial of a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings de novo. Johnson v. Johnson , 385 F.3......
  • Morgan v. Chapman
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • August 7, 2020
    ...actor. See Beck , 204 F.3d at 634. The question is whether the person was performing an investigative function. Singleton v. Cannizzaro , 956 F.3d 773, 780 (5th Cir. 2020). Where a person acts as a detective, "searching for the clues and corroboration that might give him probable cause to r......
  • Wooten v. Roach
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • July 6, 2020
    ...Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), we accept as true the following allegations in Wooten's operative complaint. See Singleton v. Cannizzaro , 956 F.3d 773, 779 (5th Cir. 2020).In March 2008, Wooten defeated Judge Charles Sandoval in the Republican primary election for a seat on the 380th Dis......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Prisoners' Rights
    • United States
    • Georgetown Law Journal No. 110-Annual Review, August 2022
    • August 1, 2022
    ...probable cause determination, and personally attesting to “truth of averments in a statement of probable cause”); Singleton v. Cannizzaro, 956 F.3d 773, 784 (5th Cir. 2020) (prosecutor not absolutely immune when using fake subpoenas to purposefully work outside judicial process); Rieves v. ......