Sinking Spring Water Co. v. Gring

Decision Date23 March 1917
Docket Number344
Citation101 A. 732,257 Pa. 340
PartiesSinking Spring Water Co. v. Gring, Appellant
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Argued: February 27, 1917

Appeal, No. 344, Jan. T., 1916, by defendant, from decree of C.P. Berks Co., April T., 1916, No. 18, dismissing exceptions to petition for appointment of viewers in the case of Sinking Spring Water Company v. Catharine Gring. Appeal quashed.

Exceptions to petition for the appointment of viewers. Before ENDLICH, P.J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

The court dismissed the exceptions. Catharine Gring appealed.

Error assigned was in dismissing the exceptions.

Appeal quashed.

Cyrus G. Derr, for appellant.

Edgar S. Richardson, for appellee, was not heard.

Before BROWN, C.J., MESTREZAT, STEWART, MOSCHZISKER and FRAZER, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from the dismissal of exceptions to the petition of the appellee for the appointment of viewers to assess the damages, if any, sustained by the appellant in its taking her property in the exercise of an alleged right of eminent domain. The action of the court below is clearly not a final decree. No judgment or decree is final that does not terminate the litigation between the parties to the suit: Pennsylvania Steel Company's App., 161 Pa. 571. The appeal is, therefore, quashed, at appellant's costs, without prejudice to her right to raise, in this court, on appeal from a final decree against her in this proceeding, or by a proper independent proceeding to be instituted by her, the question of the right or franchise of the appellant to take her property.

Appeal quashed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT