Siragusa v. TRAVELODGE CORPORATION

Citation352 F.2d 516
Decision Date16 November 1965
Docket NumberNo. 21815.,21815.
PartiesFrank J. SIRAGUSA et al., Appellants, v. The TRAVELODGE CORPORATION, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Hugh P. Carter and Jennings, Carter & Thompson, Birmingham, Ala., for appellants.

Drayton T. Scott, Birmingham, Ala., Arch R. Tuthill, John J. Waller, Los Angeles, Cal., L. Murray Alley and Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner & Clark, Birmingham, Ala., Flint & MacKay, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel, for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and RIVES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants complain of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama permanently enjoining them from using the name "TraveLodge" or any name similar thereto, in connection with any motel, motor hotel, restaurant or related activity. The appellee, The TraveLodge Corporation, instituted the litigation claiming that the appellants had violated its registered service mark and were engaged in unfair competition in the use of such mark. The appellants claimed prior use of the mark in Alabama, the right to the exclusive use thereof within the State of Alabama, and fraud on the part of the appellee in the procurement of its registered service mark. By counterclaim, appellants also sought an injunction prohibiting use of the mark by appellee in Alabama, cancellation of appellee's mark, or in the alternative, to exclude use thereof by the appellee in Alabama or at least in Birmingham.

The facts were fully developed during the trial. There were a number of witnesses and numerous exhibits. We have carefully examined the record and given full consideration to the contentions of the parties. We agree with the opinion and judgment of the district court. The TraveLodge Corporation v. Siragusa, et al., D.C., 228 F.Supp. 238 (1964). The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • King-Size, Inc. v. Frank's King Size Clothes, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • August 30, 1982
    ...(M.D.Tenn. 1971), aff'd, 470 F.2d 975 (6th Cir. 1972); Travelodge Corp. v. Siragusa, 228 F.Supp. 238, 243 (N.D.Ala.1964), aff'd, 352 F.2d 516 (5th Cir. 1964). "Statements of honest, but perhaps incorrect, belief or innocently inaccurate statements of fact are insufficient as are knowing mis......
  • Wrist-Rocket Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Saunders Archery Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • June 9, 1975
    ...supra § 97.3(c)(1) at 599. See Travelodge Corporation v. Siragusa, 228 F.Supp. 238, 242 (N.D.Ala.1964), aff'd per curiam, 352 F.2d 516 (5th Cir. 1965). An incontestable registration is the exception to the rule that conclusive vested rights are not conferred by registration. 4 Callmann, sup......
  • Five Platters, Inc. v. Purdie
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • July 9, 1976
    ...(M.D.Tenn.1971), aff'd, 470 F.2d 975 (6th Cir. 1972); Travelodge Corp. v. Siragusa, 228 F.Supp. 238, 243 (N.D.Ala.1964), aff'd, 352 F.2d 516 (5th Cir. 1964). Statements of honest, but perhaps incorrect, belief or innocently inaccurate statements of fact are insufficient as are knowing misst......
  • John R. Thompson Co. v. Holloway
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • October 7, 1966
    ...Stores, Inc., 2 Cir. 1959, 267 F.2d 358, 362, 363; see Travelodge Corporation v. Siragusa, N. D.Ala.1964, 228 F.Supp. 238, aff'd, 5 Cir. 1965, 352 F.2d 516; Sterling Brewing, Inc. v. Cold Spring Brewing Corp., D.C.Mass.1951, 100 F.Supp. 412, 418, modified on rehearing, D.C.Mass.1952, 92 U.S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT