Siravo v. Sirian Lamp Co., 24.
| Citation | 124 N.J.L. 433,12 A.2d 682 |
| Decision Date | 25 April 1940 |
| Docket Number | No. 24.,24. |
| Parties | SIRAVO v. SIRIAN LAMP CO. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey) |
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Mandamus proceeding by Michael Siravo against the Sirian Lamp Company. From an alternative writ of mandamus directing the Sirian Lamp Company and the Sirian Wire & Contact Company to present their books and records to a certified public accountant for examination, the Sirian Lamp Company appeals.
Affirmed.
Kristeller & Zucker and Lionel P. Kristeller, all of Newark, for appellant.
Gross & Gross, Isaac Gross, and Bernard A. Green, all of Jersey City, for respondent.
This is an appeal from an alternative writ of mandamus allowed by Mr. Justice Parker. The writ directs the Sirian Lamp Company and the Sirian Wire and Contact Company, its wholly owned subsidiary, to present their books and records to a certified public accountant selected by the court for examination from a period beginning January 1, 1937, to the present.
The Sirian Lamp Company, a Delaware corporation, maintains its office in the city of Newark and keeps all its books and records there. The Sirian Wire and Contact Company, a wholly owned subsidiary, is actively engaged in the manufacturing business in that city, and all of its books and records are kept at the office of the Sirian Lamp Company. The applicant for the writ owns a substantial amount of the stock of the Sirian Lamp Company.
In awarding the examination, the Supreme Court was not regulating the affairs of a foreign corporation, but was affording an opportunity to stockholders having a substantial interest in the Sirian Lamp Company, with the aid of an impartial accountant, to examine the books and records of the company and its wholly owned subsidiary. The common law, when facts appeared as they do in this case, recognized the right of a stockholder to inspect the books of a corporation, if the application was made in good faith and concerning a matter germane to the protection of existing rights. Feick v. Hill Bread Co., 91 N.J.L. 486, 488, 103 A. 813. The books and records being within this state and not subject, so far as we know, to inspection at the command of any other court, may be examined by direction of the Supreme Court. In fact, without such remedy the aggrieved stockholder, acting in good faith, would be denied a remedy for no reason whatever.
The writ is not in reality directed against the Sirian Wire and Contact Company, but to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Everson v. Bd. Of Educ. Of Ewing Tp.
-
Danziger v. Luse
...154 Mich. 459, 117 N.W. 893; State ex rel. United Brick & Tile Co. v. Wright (1936), 339 Mo. 160, 95 S.W.2d 804; Siravo v. Sirian Lamp Co. (1940), 124 N.J.L. 433, 12 A.2d 682; Bailey v. Boxboard Prods. Co. (1934), 314 Pa. 45, 170 A. 127; Williams v. Freeport Sulphur Co. (Tex.Civ.App.1930), ......
- Romano v. Borough of Metuchen, s. 32, 36.