Skidmore v. H.C. Whitmer Co., 8 Div. 222.

Citation130 So. 194,221 Ala. 561
Decision Date09 October 1930
Docket Number8 Div. 222.
PartiesSKIDMORE ET AL. v. H. C. WHITMER CO.
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County; A. E. Hawkins, Judge.

Action by the H. C. Whitmer Company against J. E. Skidmore, G. L. Gober, and J. S. Garrison. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

Transferred from Court of Appeals.

Affirmed.

T. Harvey Wright, of Guntersville, and Wright & McAfee, of Decatur, for appellants.

D. Isabell, of Guntersville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The ruling of the court upon the demurrers to the complaint and pleas cannot be reviewed by this court. There is no formal judgment as to same, and the action of the trial court is indicated only by the bench notes, and which fall short of such a judgment or adjudication as required by law. McDonald v. Alabama Midland Railway Co., 123 Ala. 227, 26 So. 165.

There is no complaint as to the ruling upon the evidence, and the only other errors insisted upon pertain to the conclusion of the court in rendering a judgment for the plaintiff, the case having been tried without a jury. The bill of exceptions does not purport to contain all the evidence; therefore the judgment of the trial court cannot be disturbed.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

ANDERSON, C.J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Hiller v. Goodwin
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1953
    ...Ala. 222, 5 So.2d 472; Wilbanks v. Mitchell, 239 Ala. 167, 194 So. 513; Cooper v. Owen, 230 Ala. 316, 161 So. 98; Skidmore v. H. C. Whitmer Co., 221 Ala. 561, 130 So. 194; McDonald v. Alabama-Midland R. Co., 123 Ala. 227, 26 So. We predicate our conclusion as to assignment No. 12 on that st......
  • Coleman v. State, 4 Div. 234
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • January 5, 1954
    ...and there are no formal judgments in these aspects appearing. Beatty v. State, 36 Ala.App. 699, 63 So.2d 287; Skidmore v. H. C. Whitmer Co., 221 Ala. 561, 130 So. 194; Aplin v. Dean, 231 Ala. 320, 164 So. 737; Jones v. Daniel, 34 Ala.App. 490, 41 So.2d 627; Campbell v. State, 29 Ala.App. 34......
  • Dawson v. Campbell
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 19, 1960
    ...Ala. 222, 5 So.2d 472; Wilbanks v. Mitchell, 239 Ala. 167, 194 So. 513; Cooper v. Owen, 230 Ala. 316, 161 So. 98; Skidmore v. H. C. Whitmer Co., 221 Ala. 561, 130 So. 194; Alabama National Bank v. Hunt, 125 Ala. 512, 28 So. 488; McDonald v. Alabama Midland Railway Co., 123 Ala. 227, 26 So. ......
  • Cooper v. Mann
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • August 20, 1959
    ...Ala. 222, 5 So.2d 472; Wilbanks v. Mitchell, 239 Ala. 167, 194 So. 513; Cooper v. Owen, 230 Ala. 316, 161 So. 98; Skidmore v. H. C. Whitmer Co., 221 Ala. 561, 130 So. 194; Alabama National Bank v. Hunt, 125 Ala. 512, 28 So. 488; McDonald v. Alabama Midland Railway Co., 123 Ala. 227, 26 So. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT