Skille v. Martinez
Citation | 289 Or.App. 637,407 P.3d 998 (Mem) |
Decision Date | 28 December 2017 |
Docket Number | A159729 |
Parties | Kia SKILLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tony Rey MARTINEZ, in his individual capacity, Defendant, and Oregon State Hospital, a State agency; and Department of Human Services, a State agency, Defendants-Respondents. |
Court | Court of Appeals of Oregon |
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Peenesh Shah, Assistant Attorney General, for petition.
Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and Garrett, Judge, and Wollheim, Senior Judge.
The Department of Human Services (DHS) petitions for reconsideration of our decision in Skille v. Martinez , 288 Or. App. 207, 406 P.3d 126 (2017), which reversed and remanded the trial court's judgment of dismissal. DHS requests that we modify our disposition to make it clear that the trial court's judgment is reversed only as to defendant Oregon State Hospital (OSH), not as to DHS, which plaintiff had previously agreed to dismiss from the case. Plaintiff does not oppose the relief requested.
The petition is allowed for the limited purpose of clarifying that the judgment below is reversed as to OSH but affirmed as to DHS. Specifically, we modify our former opinion by inserting the following footnote at the end of the second full paragraph at 288 Or App at 209, 406 P.3d 126 : We also withdraw our former disposition and replace it with the following: "Reversed and remanded as to Oregon State Hospital; otherwise affirmed."
Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified; reversed and remanded as to respondent Oregon State Hospital; otherwise affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Meyer v. State
...those factual allegations." Skille v. Martinez , 288 Or. App. 207, 209-10, 406 P.3d 126, adh'd to as modified on recons , 289 Or. App. 637, 407 P.3d 998 (2017) (internal quotation marks omitted). As noted, the claims at issue were brought under section 1983, which provides:"Every person who......
-
Kutz v. Lee
...adequately pleaded OTCA notice. Skille v. Martinez , 288 Or. App. 207, 209-10, 219, 406 P.3d 126, adh'd to as mod on recons , 289 Or. App. 637, 407 P.3d 998 (2017) (reversing trial court's dismissal of complaint under ORCP 21 A(8) based on OTCA notice allegations).When the discovery rule is......
-
Moyer v. Columbia State Bank
...state a claim for legal error." Skille v. Martinez , 288 Or. App. 207, 210, 406 P.3d 126, adh'd to as modified on recons. , 289 Or. App. 637, 407 P.3d 998 (2017). The Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure require only that a complaint contain a "plain and concise statement of the ultimate facts c......