Skiver v. Brighton Meadows

Decision Date10 February 1992
Docket NumberNo. 02A03-9110-CV-325,02A03-9110-CV-325
Citation585 N.E.2d 1345
PartiesJ. Michael SKIVER, Appellant-Defendant, v. BRIGHTON MEADOWS, Appellee-Plaintiff.
CourtIndiana Appellate Court

Daniel E. Serban, Timothy L. Claxton, Shambaugh, Kast, Beck, & Williams, Fort Wayne, for appellant-defendant.

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Appellant-defendant J. Michael Skiver appeals the small claims court's decision in favor of appellee-plaintiff Brighton Meadows.

One issue is raised for review: whether Brighton Meadows was precluded from recovering damages from J. Michael Skiver (Skiver) for breach of the rental agreement when an itemized list of damages had not been given to Skiver pursuant to IND.CODE Sec. 32-7-5-15 (1991 Supp.).

On April 12, 1990, Skiver entered into a lease agreement with Brighton Meadows wherein he agreed to lease the premises for a period of twelve months beginning May 1, 1990. The agreement required him to pay $5,640.00 payable in monthly installments in the amount of $470.00, which amount was subsequently reduced by addendum to $430.83, and give the landlord a security deposit of $250.00. Skiver further delivered an additional $100.00 as a pet security.

In November 1990, Brighton Meadows filed suit against Skiver claiming that Skiver had "breached the agreement and is indebted to the Plaintiff as follows: back rent: $4,230.00, damages to the rental unit: $---, attorney fees ... $1,000.00." Brighton Meadows requested judgment against Skiver for $3,000.00, the jurisdictional amount in small claims court.

After a hearing on this matter, the court determined that Skiver had moved in June 1990, paying only $100.00 for June and nothing thereafter. Skiver was unable to relet the premises until March of 1991. Therefore, there was eight months rent due plus the remainder of the rent for June 1990. The court awarded Brighton Meadows a judgment of $2,650.00 ($3,000.00 minus Skiver's security deposit of $350.00). Additionally, the court found "[p]laintiff claims no physical damage to the premises and consequently did not submit a 45 day letter to the defendant pursuant to the provisions of I.C. Sec. 32-7-5-1, et. seq."

This chapter of the Indiana Code, Sec. 32-7-5-1 et seq. (1991 Supp.), entitled "Security Deposits," is the issue in this appeal. The chapter applies to all rental agreements. IND.CODE Sec. 32-7-5-1 (1991 Supp.). It provides that when a rental agreement is terminated, the security deposit must be returned unless it is to be applied to the payment of accrued rent, damages that the landlord has or will reasonably suffer by reason of the tenant's noncompliance with law or the rental agreement, or to unpaid utility or sewer charges. IND.CODE Sec. 32-7-5-12 (1991 Supp.). When the security deposit is being retained due to any of the above circumstances, the landlord must send a written notice to the tenant, itemizing the above obligations, within 45 days after termination of the rental agreement and delivery of possession. Id.

Security deposits are permitted to be used for the following purposes:

"(1) To reimburse the landlord for actual damages to the rental unit or any ancillary facility that are not the result of ordinary wear and tear expected in the normal course of habitation of a dwelling.

(2) To pay the landlord for all rent in arrearage under the rental agreement, and rent due for premature termination of the rental agreement by the tenant.

(3) To pay for the last payment period of a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Klotz v. Hoyt
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • January 22, 2009
    ...688 N.E.2d 1319, 1321 (Ind.Ct.App.1997), trans. denied; Duchon v. Ross, 599 N.E.2d 621, 625 (Ind.Ct.App.1992); Skiver v. Brighton Meadows, 585 N.E.2d 1345, 1347 (Ind.Ct.App.1992)). Lastly, I note in support of my position the long period of apparent legislative acquiescence to these ...
  • Klotz v. Hoyt
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • February 25, 2008
    ...damages' only if it returns the tenant's security deposit within 45 days or provides the statutory notice."); Skiver v. Brighton Meadows, 585 N.E.2d 1345, 1347 (Ind.Ct.App.1992) (holding that because the landlord "did not provide [the tenant] with a list of damages under section 13, in this......
  • Miller v. Geels
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • November 30, 1994
    ...the tenant's security deposit within 45 days or provides statutory notice. Id. at 625 (emphasis added); see Skiver v. Brighton Meadows (1992), Ind.App., 585 N.E.2d 1345, 1347. Thus, where the landlord provides the notice required in order to apply the security deposit to those damages expre......
  • Hill v. Davis, 32A05-0412-CV-694.
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • August 10, 2005
    ...did not include estimated costs did not comply with the notice requirement of the security deposit statute); Skiver v. Brighton Meadows, 585 N.E.2d 1345, 1347 (Ind.Ct.App.1992) (holding that the landlord was required to return the full security deposit to the tenant where the landlord had f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT