Skokomish Indian Tribe v. U.S., 01-35028.
| Decision Date | 23 February 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. 01-35028.,No. 01-35845.,01-35028.,01-35845. |
| Parties | SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE, a federally recognized Indian tribe in its own capacity as a class representative and as parens patriae; Denny S. Hurtado; Gordon A. James; Joseph Pavel; Anne Pavel; Maures P. Tinaza; Celeste F. Vigil; Roslynne L. Reed; Gary W. Peterson, Rita C. Andrews; Tom G. Strong; Marie E. Gouley; Victoria J. Pavel; Dennis W. Allen; Joseph Andrews, Sr.; Zetha Cush; Elsie M. Allen; Alex L. Gouley, Jr.; Lawrence L. Kenyon; Doris Miller; Gerald B. Miller; Helen M. Rudy; Ronald D. Twiddy, Sr. Nick G. Wilbur. Sr., Petitioners-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; Tacoma Public Utility, a Washington municipal corporation; City of Tacoma, a Washington municipal corporation; William Barker, Tacoma Public Utilities Board Member in his official capacity; Tom Hilyard, Tacoma Public Utilities Board Member in his official capacity; Robert Lane; Tim Strege; G.E. Vaughn, Defendants-Appellees. Skokomish Indian Tribe, a federally recognized Indian tribe in its own capacity as a class representative and as parens patriae; Denny S. Hurtado; Gordon A. James; Joseph Pavel; Anne Pavel; Maures P. Tinaza; Celeste F. Vigil; Roslynne L. Reed; Gary W. Peterson; Rita C. Andrews; Tom G. Strong, Marie E. Gouley; Victoria J. Pavel; Dennis W. Allen; Joseph Andrews, Sr.; Zetha Cush; Elsie M. Allen; Alex L. Gouley, Jr. Lawrence L. Kenyon; Doris Miller; Gerald B. Miller; Helen M. Rudy; Ronald D. Twiddy, Sr.; Nick G. Wilbur, Sr., Skokomish Indian Tribal members for themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Tacoma Public Utility, a Washington municipal corporation; City of Tacoma, a Washington municipal corporation; William Barker, Tacoma Public Utilities Board Member in his official capacity; Tom Hilyard, Tacoma Public Utilities Board Member in his official capacity; Robert Lane; Tim Strege; G.E. Vaughn; United States Internal Revenue Service, Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Mason D. Morisset, Esq., Morisset, Schlosser, Homer, Jozwiak & McGaw, Seattle, WA, for Petitioners-Appellants.
Robert D. Kamenshine, Esq., Robert S. Greenspan, Esq., Washington, DC, Philip H. Lynch, Esq., Tacoma, WA, Kenneth G. Kieffer, Esq., Ronald B. Leighton, Esq., J. Richard Creatura, Esq., Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & Daheim, Timothy L. Ashcraft, Esq., Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Dianne K. Conway, Esq., Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States
...F.3d 551 (9th Cir. 2003). On February 23, 2004, the Ninth Circuit granted a petition for rehearing en banc. Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States, 358 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2004). On June 3, 2005, the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, ruled against the Tribe on its FPA claims, as well as its ......
-
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. U.S.
...have dismissed the treaty-based claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We took the case en banc. Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States, 358 F.3d 1180, 1181 (9th Cir.2004). ANALYSIS I. Claims Against the United A. Treaty-Based Claims The Tribe seeks relief against the United State......
-
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. U.S., 01-35028.
...have dismissed the treaty-based claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We took the case en banc. Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States, 358 F.3d 1180, 1181 (9th Cir.2004). ANALYSIS I. Claims Against the United A. Treaty-Based Claims The Tribe seeks relief against the United State......