Skotak v. Vic Tanny Intern., Inc., Docket No. 146857

Decision Date08 February 1994
Docket NumberDocket No. 146857
Citation203 Mich.App. 616,513 N.W.2d 428
PartiesDeborah SKOTAK, Personal Representative of the Estate of James Anthony Skotak, Deceased, and Deborah Skotak, Individually, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIC TANNY INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

Trenta & Counsman by Thomas J. Trenta and Richard T. Counsman, Bloomfield Hills, for plaintiff.

Lupo, Koczkur & Petrella, P.C. by Paul S. Koczkur and Sandra M. Vozza, Detroit, for defendant.

Before MARK J. CAVANAGH, P.J., and BRENNAN and BENSON, * JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Deborah Skotak, brought suit against defendant, Vic Tanny International, Inc., on various counts, including negligence. The circuit court granted defendant's motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) (claim barred by release). Plaintiff appeals as of right from the circuit court's final order, and we affirm.

Plaintiff alleged that her decedent, James Skotak, a member of defendant health club, suffered a fatal heart attack while sitting in the steam room at defendant's Plymouth, Michigan, facility. She further alleged that defendant was negligent in failing to ensure that its staff was trained to respond to such emergencies (and, in particular, to administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation).

The circuit court granted defendant's motion for summary disposition, finding the claim barred by a release clause contained in the membership contract entered into by the decedent and defendant. The issue on appeal is whether the motion for summary disposition was properly granted.

When reviewing a motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7), this Court accepts all of the plaintiff's well-pleaded allegations as true and construes them most favorably to the plaintiff. We must consider all affidavits, pleadings, depositions, admissions, and documentary evidence filed or submitted by the parties. The motion should be granted only if no factual development could provide a basis for recovery. Dedes v. South Lyon Community Schools, 199 Mich.App. 385, 388, 502 N.W.2d 720 (1993), lv. gtd. 444 Mich. 895, 512 N.W.2d 316 (1993).

It is not contrary to this state's public policy for a party to contract against liability for damages caused by its own ordinary negligence. Dombrowski v. City of Omer, 199 Mich.App. 705, 709, 502 N.W.2d 707 (1993); Paterek v. 6600 Ltd., 186 Mich.App. 445, 448, 465 N.W.2d 342 (1990); Chrysler Corp. v. Brencal Contractors, Inc., 146 Mich.App. 766, 772-774, 381 N.W.2d 814 (1985). The validity of a contract of release turns on the intent of the parties. To be valid, a release must be fairly and knowingly made. A release is invalid if (1) the releasor was dazed, in shock, or under the influence of drugs, (2) the nature of the instrument was misrepresented, or (3) there was other fraudulent or overreaching conduct. Dombrowski, supra; Paterek, supra 186 Mich.App. at 449, 465 N.W.2d 342.

The contractual language at issue in this case provides as follows:

F. By the use of the facilities of Seller and/or by the attendance at any of the gymnasiums owned by Seller, the Member expressly agrees that Seller shall not be liable for any damages arising from personal injuries sustained by the Member or his guest in, on or about the premises of the said gymnasiums or as a result of their using the facilities and the equipment therein. By the execution of this agreement Member accepts full responsibility of [sic] any such injuries or damages which may occur to the Member or guest in, on or about the premises of the said gymnasiums and further agrees that Seller shall not be liable for any loss or theft of personal property. Member assumes full responsibility for any injuries, damages or losses which may occur to Member or guest, in, on or about the premises of said gymnasiums and does hereby fully and forever release and discharge Seller and all associated gymnasiums, their owners, employees and agents from any and all claims, demands, damages, rights of action, or causes of action, present or future, whether the same be known or unknown, anticipated, or unanticipated, resulting from or arising out of the Member's or his guests [sic] use or intended use of the said gymnasiums or the facilities and equipment thereof.

We reject plaintiff's claim that the quoted provision is ambiguous. The inclusive language, "any and all claims, demands, damages, rights of action, or causes of action, ... arising out of the Member's ... use of the ... facilities," clearly expresses defendant's intention to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 cases
  • Macomb Interceptor Drain Drainage Dist. v. Kilpatrick
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • 17 Septiembre 2012
    ...assignment to it to pursue all claims arising from the 15 Mile Interceptor Repair Project, and quotes Skotak v. Vic Tanny Intern., Inc., 203 Mich.App. 616, 513 N.W.2d 428 (1994) for the proposition that “there is no broader classification than the word ‘all[,]’ [and] [i]n its ordinary and n......
  • Brintley v. St. Mary Mercy Hosp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • 16 Noviembre 2012
    ...than the word ‘all.’ In its ordinary and natural meaning, the word ‘all’ leaves no room for exceptions.” Skotak v. Vic Tanny Int'l, 203 Mich.App. 616, 619, 513 N.W.2d 428,app. denied,447 Mich. 970, 523 N.W.2d 632 (1994). Such a waiver is valid if the surrounding facts and circumstances make......
  • Woodman v. Llc
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 18 Junio 2010
    ...result of the contestant's signing it without reading it, absent any allegation of misrepresentation); Skotak v. Vic Tanny Int'l, Inc., 203 Mich.App. 616, 617-618, 513 N.W.2d 428 (1994) ("It is not contrary to this state's public policy for a party to contract against liability for damages ......
  • Sa v. Red Frog Events, LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • 22 Octubre 2013
    ...permits “a party to contract against liability or damages caused by its own ordinary negligence.” Skotak v. Vic Tanny Intern., Inc., 203 Mich.App. 616, 617–18, 513 N.W.2d 428 (1994). Plaintiff does not dispute that he signed the Waiver and provides no factual support to avoid the consequenc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT