Slattery v. People of State

Decision Date31 January 1875
Citation1875 WL 8176,76 Ill. 217
PartiesTREVIOR SLATTERYv.THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

WRIT OF ERROR to the Circuit Court of Hancock county; the Hon. JOSEPH SIBLEY, Judge, presiding.

This was an indictment against Trevior Slattery, for producing the miscarriage of his wife, Celestia Slattery, by beating her, etc. The defendant was convicted, and sentenced to three years' imprisonment in the penitentiary.

Mr. HENRY W. DRAPER, and Mr. GEO. EDMUNDS, Jr., for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. B. F. PETERSON, State's Attorney, and Mr. JAS. K. EDSALL, Attorney General, for the People. Mr. JUSTICE BREESE delivered the opinion of the Court:

Plaintiff in error was indicted, at the June term, 1874, of the Hancock circuit court, for feloniously, unlawfully and maliciously beating, striking, kicking, pinching and crushing one Celestia Slattery, a pregnant woman, with intent unlawfully, feloniously and maliciously to cause her to miscarry, and by means whereof she did miscarry.

The jury found the defendant guilty, and fixed his imprisonment in the penitentiary at three years. A motion for a new trial was denied, and judgment rendered on the verdict.

The record is brought here by writ of error, and various errors assigned. Those which are deemed important will be noticed.

The section of the statute under which the indictment was found is as follows: “Whoever, by means of any instrument, medicine, drug, or other means whatever, causes any woman pregnant with child to abort or miscarry, or attempts to procure an abortion or miscarriage, etc., shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary not less than one year nor more than ten years.” Rev. 1874, p. 352.

This statute is evidently aimed at professional abortionists, and at those who, with the intent and design of producing abortion, shall use any means to that end, no matter what those means may be, but not at those who, with no such purpose in view, should, by a violent act, unfortunately produce such a result. The intent to produce an abortion must exist when the means are used. That is the charge in the indictment. It is there charged the prisoner did feloniously and maliciously beat this pregnant woman, with intent unlawfully, feloniously, etc., to cause her to miscarry.

The party alleged to have been so beaten is the wife of the prisoner, who, by his own confession, had not treated her in the kindest manner, but there is not a particle of proof in the record going to show that her miscarriage was caused by any violence he at any time used towards her, or that he had the least idea such would be the result, or that he desired or intended such a result.

A felonious and malicious intent to cause a miscarriage being charged in the indictment, circumstances sufficient to satisfy the jury of the intent, should be shown. A criminal offense consists in a violation of a public law, in the commission of which there must be a union or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • People v. White
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 1 Junio 1977
    ...in others, the court found it necessary to imply a mental-state element. (E. g. 'intent' in causing abortion (sec. 3): Slattery v. People, 76 Ill. 217 (1875); People v. Gleitsmann, 384 Ill. 303, 51 N.E.2d 261 (1943); or in failing or refusing to pay over money collected by an attorney, etc.......
  • People v. Pfanschmidt
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 14 Abril 1914
    ...People v. Conrow, 200 N. Y. 356, 93 N. E. 943;O'Hearn v. State, 79 Neb. 513, 113 N. W. 130,25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 542, note; Slattery v. People, 76 Ill. 217;Simmons v. State, 50 Tex. Cr. R. 527, 97 S. W. 1052;Couch v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 505, 126 S. W. 866;People v. Kessler, 13 Utah, 69, 44 ......
  • People v. Hagenow
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 3 Diciembre 1908
    ...under said statute to negative the fact that the miscarriage or abortion was necessary to save the mother's life. And in Slattery v. People, 76 Ill. 217, it was said that the statute was evidently aimed at the professional abortionist. If it is necessary to negative the fact that the miscar......
  • State v. Young
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 27 Enero 1890
    ... ... v. Walker, 13 Allen, 510; State v ... Walker, 78 Mo. 388; Com. v. McDermott, 123 ... Mass. 470; State v. Glahn, 97 Mo. 694; Slattery ... v. People, 76 Ill. 217; Bob v. State, 32 Ala ... 560; State v. Hamilton, 55 Mo. 520. (2) The court ... erred in permitting the state to ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT