Sloan v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.
Decision Date | 29 March 1939 |
Citation | 27 F. Supp. 108 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of West Virginia |
Parties | SLOAN v. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. |
R. G. Lilly, of Charleston, W. Va., for plaintiff.
J. B. Meek, of Huntington, W. Va., for defendant.
E. Paul Williams, of Ashland, Ky., for intervener.
Plaintiff, a resident of Kentucky, instituted this action against defendant, a resident of West Virginia, to recover $15,000 damages for personal injuries sustained in West Virginia. The matter is now before me upon motion of the Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation to intervene as a party plaintiff under Rule 24(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
Plaintiff was employed in the State of Kentucky by Catlettsburg, Kenova and Ceredo Water Company and was injured in the course of his employment while temporarily in West Virginia. He alleges that his injuries, a severe electric shock, were caused by the negligence of the defendant power company in the maintenance of its power lines. The water company carried an insurance policy with the insurance company, whereby the latter agreed to carry or adjust any workman's compensation claims which would arise against the water company. Plaintiff made claim for his injuries to the water company. This claim was accepted and is being paid by the insurance company. The insurance company has paid plaintiff $12.48 per week since the date of injury and will continue to pay him for such time as specified under the Kentucky Compensation Act (Ky.St. § 4880 et seq.), including medical expense not to exceed $400. It asks to intervene as a party plaintiff in order that such expenditures may be recovered out of any judgment against the power company. The plaintiff resists such motion.
The insurance company bases its right of subrogation upon Section 4890 of Baldwin's 1936 Revised Edition, Kentucky Statutes. That statute provides as follows: "
This statute has been fully construed by the Supreme Court of Kentucky in Berry, et al. v. Irwin, et al., 224 Ky. 565, 6 S.W.2d 705. There suit was brought by the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Overcash v. Yellow Transit Co.
... ... Workmen's Compensation Commission had the jurisdiction ... and power to adjudicate the questions here involved, or ... whether it is merely a ... 1216, 126 S.W.2d 204; Hartman v. Union Electric, 331 ... Mo. 230, 53 S.W.2d 241; Muse v. Whitney, 227 Mo.App ... White ... Eagle Oil Co., 47 F.2d 615; Sloan v. Appalachian ... Power Co., 27 F.Supp. 108; Tidwell v. Chattanooga ... ...
-
Harris Corp., Data Communications v. Comair, Inc.
...workmen's compensation law to be the employees of both. 21 See 18 Am.Jur.2d Workman's Compensation § 4; Sloan v. Appalachian Electric Power Co., 27 F.Supp. 108 (S.D.W.Va.1939); Employer's Liability Corp. v. Webb, 283 Ky. 115, 140 S.W.2d 825 (1940). 22 283 Ky. 115, 140 S.W.2d 825 (1940) (whe......
-
Greene v. Verven
...F.2d 277 (2 Cir. 1957); First Nat'l Bank in Greensburg v. M. & G. Convoy Inc., 102 F.Supp. 494 (W.D.Pa. 1952); Sloan v. Appalachian Elec. Power Co., 27 F.Supp. 108 (S.D.W.Va.1939). New York Workmen's Compensation Law, McKinney's Consol.Laws, c. 67, § 29(1) provides in relevant part "If an e......
-
Employer's Liability Corp. v. Webb
... ... 581, 237 N.W ... 671; Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Texas Power & Light ... Co., Tex.Civ.App., 35 S.W.2d 782; Travelers' ... Ins. Co. v ... 589, 258 N.Y.S ... In the ... case of Sloan v. Appalachian Power Co., D.C., 27 ... F.Supp. 108, 109, it appears that ... ...