Small Business Administration v. Clellan, No. 42

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtBLACK
Citation5 L.Ed.2d 200,81 S.Ct. 191,364 U.S. 446
PartiesSMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Petitioner, v. G. M. McCLELLAN, Trustee
Decision Date05 December 1960
Docket NumberNo. 42

364 U.S. 446
81 S.Ct. 191
5 L.Ed.2d 200
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Petitioner,

v.

G. M. McCLELLAN, Trustee.

No. 42.
Argued Nov. 9, 10, 1960.
Decided Dec. 5, 1960.

Mr. Morton Hollander, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Mr. John Q. Royce, Salina, Kan., for respondent.

Page 447

Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Small Business Act of 19531 created the Small Business Administration to 'aid, counsel, assist, and protect insofar as is possible the interests of small-business concerns in order to preserve free competitive enterprise * * * and to maintain and strengthen the overall economy of the Nation.'2 The Administration was given extraordinarily broad powers to accomplish these important objectives, including that of lending money to small businesses whenever they could not get necessary loans on reasonable terms from private lenders.3 When a part, but not all, of a necessary loan can be obtained from a bank or other private lender, the Administration is empowered to join that private lender in making the loan.4 The basic question this case presents is whether, when the Administration has joined a private bank in a loan and the borrower becomes a bankrupt, the Administration's interest in the unpaid balance of the loan is entitled to the priority provided for 'debts due to the United States' in R.S. § 3466 and § 64 of the Bankruptcy Act,5 even though the Administration has agreed to share any money collected on the loan with the private bank.

That question arises out of a joint bank-Administration loan of $20,000 to a small business, $5,000 of the loan having come from the funds of the bank and $15,000 from the Government Treasury. Nine months later, an involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed against the borrower

Page 448

by other creditors. The Administration appeared in the proceedings upon that petition, filed a claim for $16,355.69, the amount then due on the loan, including interest, and asserted priority for its claim to the extent of $12,266.75, its 75 per cent interest in the debt. After a hearing, the referee in bankruptcy denied priority on the ground that the Administration is a 'legal entity' and therefore not entitled to the 'privileges and immunities of the United States.' The District Court, on review, rejected the ground upon which the referee had relied but concluded that since the bankrupt's note evidencing the loan was not assigned by the bank to the Administration until after the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, the debt is not entitled to priority. 6 The Court of Appeals affirmed on a third ground—that the Administration, having contracted to pay the participating private bank one-fourth of any distribution received, could not assert its priority and thus permit a private party to benefit from a priority which, under R.S. § 3466 and the Bankruptcy Act, belongs to the Government alone.7 We granted certiorari to consider the Government's contention that the denial of priority to the Small Business Administration handicaps that agency in the effective performance of the duties imposed upon it by Congress.8

First. It is contended that the referee was correct in holding that the Small Business Administration is a separate legal entity and therefore not entitled to governmental priority in a bankruptcy proceeding. The contention rests upon a supposed analogy between this case and Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation9 and Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. J. G. Menihan

Page 449

Corp.,10 in which cases this Court refused to treat the corporate governmental agencies involved as the United States. Neither of those cases, however, is controlling here. The agency involved in Sloan Shipyards, the Fleet Corporation, was organized under the laws of the District of Columbia pursuant to authority of an Act of Congress which 'contemplated a corporation in which private persons might be stockholders.'11 This fact alone is enough to distinguish the Fleet Corporation from the Small Business Administration, which, as was contemplated from the beginning, gets all of its money from the Government Treasury. Our decision in the Reconstruction Finance Corp. case is equally inapplicable for that case involved only the question of whether the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, having been endowed by Congress with the capacity to sue and be sued, could be assessed costs in connection with a suit it brought. The holding that such costs could be assessed would not support a holding that the Small Business Administration is not the United States for the purpose of bankruptcy priority.12

Page 450

Thus neither of these cases requires us to hold that the Small Business Administration, an agency created to lend the money of the United States, is not entitled to all the priority that must be accorded to the United States when the time comes to collect that money. Under like circumstances we refused to deny priority for debts due to the Farm Credit Administration in United States Dept. of Agriculture, etc., v. Remund.13 As was said there of the Farm Credit Administration, the Small Business Administration...

To continue reading

Request your trial
92 practice notes
  • U.S. Small Bus. Admin. v. Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of Santa Fe, Civ. No. 20-473 MV/GBW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. District of New Mexico
    • July 15, 2021
    ...by Congress to "aid, counsel, assist, and protect insofar as it is possible the interests of small-business concerns." SBA v. McClellan , 364 U.S. 446, 447, 81 S.Ct. 191, 5 L.Ed.2d 200 (1960) (quoting Small Business Act of 1953, Pub. L. No. 83-163, § 202, 67 Stat. 232, 232 (1953)). Among th......
  • Tradeways, Ltd. v. U.S. Dep't of Treasury, Civil Action No. ELH-20-1324
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • June 24, 2020
    ...to small businesses whenever they could not get necessary loans on reasonable terms from private lenders." Small Bus. Admin. v. McClellan, 364 U.S. 446, 447 (1960). The SBA's authority to issue loans—whether in the form of direct loans, joint loans with lenders, or loan guarantees—flows fro......
  • In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc., Bankruptcy No. 90B-10421 (HCB).
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Second Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • May 3, 1990
    ...Attack, 53 Am. Bankr.L.J. 35, 66 (1979). The relationship is not that of debtor and creditor. Small Business Admin. v. McClellan, 364 U.S. 446, 450, 81 S.Ct. 191, 194-95, 5 L.Ed.2d 200 (1960);18 In re Prudence Co., 89 F.2d 689, 692 (2d Cir. 1937); In re Westover, Inc., 82 F.2d 177, 181 (2d ......
  • Penobscot Valley Hosp. v. Carranza (In re Penobscot Valley Hosp.), Case No. 19-10034
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. First Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Maine
    • January 12, 2021
    ...lending money to small businesses whenever they could not get necessary loans on reasonable terms from private lenders." SBA v. McClellan, 364 U.S. 446, 447, 81 S.Ct. 191, 5 L.Ed.2d 200 (1960) (footnote omitted). Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act empowers the SBA to make loans to small......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
92 cases
  • U.S. Small Bus. Admin. v. Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of Santa Fe, Civ. No. 20-473 MV/GBW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. District of New Mexico
    • July 15, 2021
    ...by Congress to "aid, counsel, assist, and protect insofar as it is possible the interests of small-business concerns." SBA v. McClellan , 364 U.S. 446, 447, 81 S.Ct. 191, 5 L.Ed.2d 200 (1960) (quoting Small Business Act of 1953, Pub. L. No. 83-163, § 202, 67 Stat. 232, 232 (1953)). Among th......
  • Tradeways, Ltd. v. U.S. Dep't of Treasury, Civil Action No. ELH-20-1324
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • June 24, 2020
    ...to small businesses whenever they could not get necessary loans on reasonable terms from private lenders." Small Bus. Admin. v. McClellan, 364 U.S. 446, 447 (1960). The SBA's authority to issue loans—whether in the form of direct loans, joint loans with lenders, or loan guarantees—flows fro......
  • In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc., Bankruptcy No. 90B-10421 (HCB).
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Second Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • May 3, 1990
    ...Attack, 53 Am. Bankr.L.J. 35, 66 (1979). The relationship is not that of debtor and creditor. Small Business Admin. v. McClellan, 364 U.S. 446, 450, 81 S.Ct. 191, 194-95, 5 L.Ed.2d 200 (1960);18 In re Prudence Co., 89 F.2d 689, 692 (2d Cir. 1937); In re Westover, Inc., 82 F.2d 177, 181 (2d ......
  • Penobscot Valley Hosp. v. Carranza (In re Penobscot Valley Hosp.), Case No. 19-10034
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. First Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Maine
    • January 12, 2021
    ...lending money to small businesses whenever they could not get necessary loans on reasonable terms from private lenders." SBA v. McClellan, 364 U.S. 446, 447, 81 S.Ct. 191, 5 L.Ed.2d 200 (1960) (footnote omitted). Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act empowers the SBA to make loans to small......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT