Smalls v. Aji Industries, Inc.

Decision Date12 February 2008
Docket Number13.
Citation883 N.E.2d 350,10 N.Y.3d 733
PartiesMarkking SMALLS, Appellant-Respondent, v. AJI INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Respondents, and Jahkim A. Jenkins et al., Respondents-Appellants.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the order of Supreme Court reinstated.

At 1:40 a.m. on December 14, 2001, Jahkim A. Jenkins, a novice driver, was operating a vehicle owned by his sister, Christchelle Smalls, when he misjudged a lefthand turn from Randall Avenue onto Zerega Avenue in New York City, lost control of the automobile, and struck a parked dumpster owned by AJI Industries, Inc. Markking Smalls, a passenger in the vehicle, allegedly suffered "serious injury" within the meaning of the No-Fault Law as a result (see Insurance Law § 5102[d]).

Markking Smalls subsequently sued AJI, Jenkins and Christchelle Smalls to recover for noneconomic loss and such other damages as he might be entitled to under the no-fault regime. As relevant to this appeal, he alleged that AJI "negligently maintain[ed] . . . [and] unlawfully situat[ed]" the dumpster "on public roadways" by "placing [it] on public roadways without any reflection tape, cones, triangles or other safety de-vices." AJI moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Supreme Court denied the motion, but the Appellate Division reversed, with two Justices dissenting.

"As we have stated frequently, the proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact. Failure to make such prima facie showing requires a denial of the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers" (Alvarez v. Prospect Hasp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572 [1986] [citations omitted and emphasis added]). In order to make out a prima facie case on its motion, AJI was required to show that the dumpster was located neither in a driving lane on Zerega Avenue nor in the zebra-striped safety zone where parking was not...

To continue reading

Request your trial
145 cases
  • Wallace v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 18 Marzo 2014
    ...E.g., Spector v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., 87 A.D.3d 422, 928 N.Y.S.2d 9, 10 (1st Dep't 2011); see Smalls v. AJI Indus., Inc., 10 N.Y.3d 733, 734, 853 N.Y.S.2d 526, 883 N.E.2d 350 (2008) (“[T]he proponent of a summary judgment motion must ... tender[ ] sufficient evidence to demonstrate th......
  • Eskay Diamonds LLC v. MGA Diamond Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 15 Febrero 2013
    ...judgment as a matter of law, through admissible evidence eliminating all material issues of fact. C.P.L.R. § 3212(b); Smalls v. AJI Indus., Inc., 10 N.Y.3d 733, 735 (2008); JMD Holding Corp. v. Congress Fin. Corp., 4 N.Y.3d 373, 384 (2005); Giuffrida v. Citibank Corp., 100 N.Y.2d 72, 81 (20......
  • ACC Concrete Corp. v. Core Cont'l Constr., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 21 Agosto 2013
    ...all material issues of fact. C.P.L.R. § 3212(b); Veaa v. Restani Constr. Corp., 18 N.Y.3d 499, 503 (2012); Smalls v. AJI Indus., Inc., 10 N.Y.3d 733, 735 (2008); JMD Holding Corp. v. Congress Fin. Corp., 4 N.Y.3d 373, 384 (2005); Giuffrida v. Citibank Corp., 100 N.Y.2d 72, 81 (2003). If the......
  • 517 W. 212 St. LLC v. Musik-Ayala
    • United States
    • New York Civil Court
    • 1 Diciembre 2017
    ...material issues of fact as to the claims at issue, regardless of the sufficiency of opposing papers. Smalls v. AJI Indus., Inc., 10 N.Y.3d 733, 735, 853 N.Y.S.2d 526, 883 N.E.2d 350 (2008), People v. Grasso, 50 A.D.3d 535, 545, 858 N.Y.S.2d 23 (1st Dept.), aff'd, 11 N.Y.3d 64, 862 N.Y.S.2d ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • CPLR 3211(a) (7): demurrer or merits-testing device?
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 73 No. 1, September 2009
    • 22 Septiembre 2009
    ...N.E.2d 970, 972 (N.Y. 1976) (emphasis added). (54) Guggenheimer, 357 N.E.2d at 21 (emphasis added). (55) See Smalls v. AJI Indus., Inc., 883 N.E.2d 350, 351 (N.Y. 2008); Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 501 N.E.2d 572, 574 (N.Y. 1986); see also Winegrad v. N.Y. Univ. Med. Ctr., 476 N.E.2d 642, 64......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT