Smiley v. Atkinson, 280

Decision Date20 March 1972
Docket NumberNo. 280,280
Citation265 Md. 129,287 A.2d 770
PartiesWalter SMILEY et al. v. Lillian ATKINSON, Indiv. and as Adm'x of the Estate of John C. Atkinson et al.
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

Certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals.

Robert B. Barnhouse, Baltimore (James P. Gillece, Jr., and Piper & Marbury, Baltimore, on the brief), for appellants.

Clayton A. Dietrich, Chief Asst. Sol., Baltimore, for Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.

Max R. Israelson, Baltimore (Joseph I. Pines, Harry A.E. Taylor and Israelson, Pines & Jackson, Baltimore, on the brief), for other appellees.

Argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This Court adopts the opinion of Judge Powers in Smiley v. Atkinson, Adm'x, 12 Md.App. 543, 280 A.2d 277 (1971), and therefore affirms the judgments appealed from.

Judgments affirmed with costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Inlet Associates v. Harrison Inn Inlet, Inc.
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 1 Septiembre 1990
    ...697, citing Maryland Courts and Jud.Proc.Code Ann. § 12-303 and Smiley v. Atkinson, 12 Md.App. 543, 280 A.2d 277 (1971), aff'd, 265 Md. 129, 287 A.2d 770 (1972), nor appealable under the collateral order doctrine. 61 Md.App. at 163-165, 485 A.2d at 699-98. This determination was made as a m......
  • Holste v. Burlington Northern R. Co.
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 16 Abril 1999
    ...(1984); Yaeger v. Vance, 20 Ariz.App. 399, 513 P.2d 688 (1973); Smiley v. Atkinson, 12 Md.App. 543, 280 A.2d 277 (1971), aff'd 265 Md. 129, 287 A.2d 770 (1972). See, also, generally, 5 Am.Jur.2d Appellate Review § 424 (1995). But see Swain Constr. v. Ready Mixed Concrete Co., 4 Neb.App. 316......
  • Mangum v. Maryland State Bd. of Censors
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 25 Noviembre 1974
    ...186 (1945); Barnum v. Barnum, 42 Md. 251, 294 (1875); Smiley v. Atkinson, 12 Md.App. 543, 549-551, 280 A.2d 277 (1971), aff'd, 265 Md. 129, 287 A.2d 770 (1972); Raimondi v. State, 8 Md.App. 468, 475-476, 261 A.2d 40 (1970). One well recognized exception is where the appeal is taken from an ......
  • Woznicki v. Musick
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 17 Junio 2004
    ...rel. Nixon v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe, 164 F.3d 1102 (8th Cir.1999); Smiley v. Atkinson, 12 Md.App. 543, 280 A.2d 277 (1971), aff'd, 265 Md. 129, 287 A.2d 770 (1972); Holste v. Burlington N. R.R., 256 Neb. 713, 592 N.W.2d 894 Importantly, here, were we to hold that the trial court was deprived ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT