Smith v. Alford, 46112
| Decision Date | 01 March 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 46112,46112 |
| Parties | Jeffrey Donald SMITH, a Minor, by U. c. Smith and Mary Sue Smith, Father and Mother and Next Friends v. Glenn W. ALFORD. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Hurlbert & O'Barr, Biloxi, for appellant.
Mize, Thompson & Mize, Gulfport, for appellee.
This case involves an unfortunate accident in which a six-year-old boy, Jeffrey Smith, suddenly darted out in front of an automobile driven by defendant-appellee, Glenn W. Alford, and received serious injuries. After hearing the testimony for plaintiffs, the Circuit Court of Harrison County directed a verdict for defendant. Because the evidence and any reasonable inferences from it fail to show any negligence by Alford, the judgment below is correct and is affirmed.
The only witnesses to the accident were Alford, called as an adverse witness, and a ten-year-old boy, Timothy Smith, cousin of the minor plaintiff. Alford, with his two children, was driving north on Teagarden Road. When he reached the intersection with Pass Road, he stopped pursuant to a red traffic light. He activated his left turn signal, and when the light changed to green, he made a left turn headed west on Pass Road. Stopped at a red light before Alford turned left were a truck, two school busses and several automobiles, all headed east. Alford looked at the school busses, and saw no children unloading and no stop signals on them. He then proceeded west on Pass Road for over 200 feet, when he noticed a shadow out of his left eye, felt a light impact and immediately stopped his car. Before the impact he was driving 10-15 miles per hour. There were no skid marks. Jeffrey had gone with his ten-year-old cousin to a service station on the southwest side of the road, and after completing their errand, plaintiff darted across the street between the stopped, eastbound cars and ran into the westbound lane occupied by defendant's car some 200 or more feet west of the stop light. Plaintiff's ten-year-old cousin, who saw Alford's car coming, testified that Jeffrey ran into the street between the busses.
There is not enough evidence to make a jury issue as to any negligence by defendant. Jeffrey could not be guilty of contributory negligence, but plaintiffs had the burden to offer evidence indicating that in some way defendant was negligent and that this negligence proximately contributed to the accident. Plaintiffs failed to do this. Appellants argue that defendant failed to anticipate the presence of small children in the area and to keep a reasonable...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Splain v. Hines
...other obstruction so suddenly that the motorist cannot reasonably stop or otherwise avoid injuring the child. See, e.g., Smith v. Alford, 245 So.2d 188, 189 (Miss.1971); Moseley v. Bailey, 193 So.2d 729, 731 Notwithstanding this rule and our limited scope of review, Splain would have us hol......
-
Miles v. Duckworth, 55124
...463 So.2d 1042 (Miss.1985); McLeod v. Whitten, 413 So.2d 1020 (Miss.1982); Haver v. Hinson, 385 So.2d 605 (Miss.1980); Smith v. Alford, 245 So.2d 188 (Miss.1971); Callender v. Cockrell, 217 So.2d 643 (1969); Stewart v. White, 220 So.2d 271 (Miss.1969); Butler v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 215......
-
Glorioso v. Young Mens Christian Ass'n of Jackson, 58089
...of Seth Glorioso was contradictory evidence on the issue of negligence which did not warrant the instruction, citing Smith v. Alford, 245 So.2d 188 (Miss.1971), and Morris v. Boleware, 228 Miss. 139, 87 So.2d 246 (1956). The law with respect to contributory negligence on the part of minors ......
-
Coleman v. Lehman, Civ. A. No. EC 85-226-GD-D.
...cause of the accident and that this failure constitutes negligence. Id. This case must be distinguished from the case of Smith v. Alford, 245 So.2d 188 (Miss.1971). In that case, a six-year old boy suddenly darted out from behind some parked vehicles into the defendant's path, and the defen......