Smith v. Baptiste
Citation | 287 Ga. 23,694 S.E.2d 83 |
Decision Date | 15 March 2010 |
Docket Number | No. S09A1543.,S09A1543. |
Parties | SMITH et al.v.BAPTISTE et al. |
Court | Supreme Court of Georgia |
Greenberg Traurig, Mark G. Trigg, Ryan C. Grelecki, Atlanta, for appellants.
Molden, Holley & Thompson, Regina Sledge Molden, Oni A. Holley, Atlanta, for appellees.
Powell Goldstein, Eric P. Schroeder, LeeAnn Jones, William V. Custer IV, Charles M. Cork, Jr., Atlanta, amici curiae.
Salon Baptiste and Cheryl Baptiste (Appellees) filed a complaint for damages against Chuck Smith and WQXI 790 AM (Appellants), based on allegedly defamatory statements made by Smith and broadcast by WQXI. Pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-68(a), Appellants offered to settle the case for $5,000. Appellees did not respond to the offer, which was deemed a rejection under OCGA § 9-11-68(c). The trial court subsequently granted Appellants' motion for summary judgment as to all counts of the complaint. Appellants moved for attorney's fees pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-68(b)(1). After a hearing, the trial court denied the motion for attorney's fees on the ground that OCGA § 9-11-68 violates the Georgia Constitution. This appeal followed.
1. OCGA § 9-11-68 was enacted as part of the Tort Reform Act of 2005. Fowler Properties v. Dowland, 282 Ga. 76, 77(1), 646 S.E.2d 197 (2007). It provides that either party may serve upon the other party a written demand or offer to settle a tort claim for a specified amount of money. OCGA § 9-11-68(a). Moreover, if either party's settlement demand or offer is rejected, that party may be entitled to recover attorney's fees pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-68(b), which provides:
This Court has previously concluded that OCGA § 9-11-68(b)(1) is unconstitutional as a retrospective law, but has found it unnecessary to pass on other attacks upon the constitutionality of that code section. Mikesell v. RP Motorsports, 283 Ga. 476, 477, 660 S.E.2d 534 (2008); Fowler Properties v. Dowland, supra at 79(2), 646 S.E.2d 197.
In this case, the trial court ruled that OCGA § 9-11-68 impedes access to the courts and thus violates Art. I, Sec. I, Par. XII of the Georgia Constitution of 1983, by depriving tort litigants of the right to pursue their causes of action. Art. I, Sec. I, Par. XII provides that “[n]o person shall be deprived of the right to prosecute or defend, either in person or by an attorney, that person's own cause in any of the courts of this state.” Contrary to the finding of the trial court, this Court has held that Art. I, Sec. I, Par. XII was never intended to provide a right of access to the courts, but was intended to provide only a right of choice between self-representation and representation by counsel. Couch v. Parker, 280 Ga. 580, 581(1), 630 S.E.2d 364 (2006); State of Ga. v. Moseley, 263 Ga. 680, 682(3), 436 S.E.2d 632 (1993); Nelms v. Georgian Manor Condo. Assn., 253 Ga. 410, 412-413(2), (3), 321 S.E.2d 330 (1984). Couch v. Parker, supra.
Etkind v. Suarez, 271 Ga. 352, 356-357(5), 519 S.E.2d 210 (1999).
Etkind v. Suarez, supra at 357(5), 519 S.E.2d 210.
The dissent mistakenly claims that the majority is following the holding in Bloomfield v. Liggett & Myers, 230 Ga. 484, 198 S.E.2d 144 (1973). We have not even cited that case, and instead, as explained above, are following the longstanding rule of law established by Nelms and its progeny. Regardless, it is true that in Bloomfield v. Liggett & Myers, supra, this Court quoted a statement from the Constitutional Convention of 1877 which clearly shows that the reason for the adoption of the original version of the provision now in issue was to ensure a person's right of self-representation, and in Nelms, this Court cited Bloomfield and recited the same quote from the Convention, which was reported by Samuel W. Small in “ A Stenographic Report of the Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention Held in Atlanta, Georgia, 1877 (Constitution Publishing Company, Atlanta, 1877).” Nelms v. Georgian Manor Condo. Assn., supra at 412(2), 321 S.E.2d 330. The dissent argues that this Court's reliance on that stenographic report is improper because Small was not a member or secretary of the Constitutional Convention of 1877. Rather, the dissent posits, the sole official record is found in the Journal of the Constitutional Convention of the People of Georgia, Held in the City of Atlanta in the Months of July and August, 1877 (Jas. P. Harrison & Co., State Printers and Publishers, 1877).
That journal is indeed an official record of the various motions, votes and resolutions from the Convention. However, it is not a verbatim report of the full remarks and discussions from the Convention. Instead, that part of the record is found in the Stenographic Report of the Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention, which, as its cover page clarifies, transcribes the “debates in full on all questions before the Convention.” In fact, the Journal of the Constitutional Convention includes the following resolution recognizing Small as the exclusive stenographic reporter of the Convention:
Resolved, That the thanks of this Convention are due, and are hereby tendered, to Samuel W. Small, Esq., stenographic reporter, for the very able, faithful and impartial manner in which he has reported the proceedings of this Convention; ... which resolution was agreed to.
Journal of the Constitutional Convention, supra at p. 566. Notwithstanding the dissent's misguided attempt to diminish the Stenographic Report of the Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention as a “journalist's account [,]” (Dissent, p. 98) that report is in fact a legitimate and reliable record of the Constitutional Convention of 1877. Indeed, for over a century, this Court has repeatedly, and correctly, recognized that stenographic report as a valid record of that Convention. Parrish v. Employees' Retirement System of Ga., 260 Ga. 613, 614(2), 398 S.E.2d 353 (1990); Barber v. Barber, 257 Ga. 488, 490, fn. 1, 360 S.E.2d 574 (1987) (dissent); Ga. Power Co. v. Allied Chemical Corp., 233 Ga. 558, 566(2), 212 S.E.2d 628 (1975); State v. Collett, 232 Ga. 668, 669, fn. 1, 208 S.E.2d 472 (1974); Leggett v. Macon Baptist Assn., 232 Ga. 27, 30(II), 205 S.E.2d 197 (1974); Speer v. Martin, 163 Ga. 535, 541, 136 S.E. 425 (1927) (dissent); Wright v. Hardwick, 152 Ga. 302, 309(1), 109 S.E. 903 (1921); Renfroe v. City of Atlanta, 140 Ga. 81, 85, 78 S.E. 449 (1913); Strickland v. State, 137 Ga. 1, 18, 72 S.E. 260 (1911) (dissent); Clark v. Hammond, 134 Ga. 792, 795(1), 68 S.E. 600 (1910); Southern Railway Co. v. Melton, 133 Ga. 277, 285(1), 65 S.E. 665 (1909); Epping v. City of Columbus, 117 Ga. 263, 271, 43 S.E. 803 (1903), overruled on other grounds Harrell v. Town of Whigham, 141 Ga. 322, 326, 80 S.E. 1010 (1914); Park v. Candler, 113 Ga. 647, 656(1), 39 S.E. 89 (1901); Blocker v. Boswell, 109 Ga. 230, 233, 34 S.E. 289 (1899). Furthermore, this Court is not alone, as the stenographic report has also been relied upon and cited with approval as a credible record of the 1877 Convention in various other legal authorities. Op. Atty. Gen. 89-16; John Dinan The
Meaning of State Constitutional Education Clauses: Evidence from the Constitutional Convention Debates, 70 Alb. L.Rev. 927, fn. 32 (2007); Marsha L. Baum & Christian G. Fritz American Constitution-Making: The Neglected State Constitutional Sources, 27 Hastings Const. L.Q. 199, fn. 91 (2000); Emily...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lathrop v. Deal
...... action in favor of the citizen against the [government], unless some means of redress other than suit has been afforded by the legislature." Smith v. Floyd County , 85 Ga. 420, 424, 11 S.E. 850 (1890). See also Baranan v. Fulton County , 232 Ga. 852, 856, 209 S.E.2d 188 (1974) ; Waters v. ...S17A0430, decided June 5, 2017) (citation and punctuation omitted). See also Smith v. Baptiste , 287 Ga. 23, 32, 694 S.E.2d 83 (2010) (Nahmias, J., concurring) ("Our task in 301 Ga. 429 interpreting the Constitution is to determine the ......
-
Frett v. State Farm Emp. Workers' Comp.
...v. Ctr. for a Sustainable Coast, Inc. , 294 Ga. 593, 601 (2), 755 S.E.2d 184 (2014) (quoting Smith v. Baptiste , 287 Ga. 23, 30 (1), 694 S.E.2d 83 (2010) (Nahmias, J., concurring specially)) ("The doctrine of stare decisis is always important, but it is less compelling when, as in this case......
-
The State v. Jackson
...where our incorrect decisions are more easily corrected by the democratic process. See Smith v. Salon Baptiste, 287 Ga. 23, 30, 694 S.E.2d 83 (2010) (Nahmias, J., concurring specially). However, stare decisis is not an “ ‘inexorable command,’ nor ‘a mechanical formula of adherence to the la......
-
State v. Kazmierczak
...Palmer, supra.23 Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218(1), 686 S.E.2d 786 (2009) (citations and punctuation omitted).24 Smith v. Baptiste, 287 Ga. 23, 25(1), 694 S.E.2d 83 (2010) ; see Harper, supra.25 Supra at 478.26 See, e.g., Palmer, supra at 77, 673 S.E.2d 237 (“The magistrate's task in det......
-
Torts
...230 (2012), barred plaintiff's defamation claim. Id. at 272-73, 760 S.E.2d at 1. 127. O.C.G.A. § 9-11-68 (2015).128. See Smith v. Baptiste, 287 Ga. 23, 24, 694 S.E.2d 83, 84 (2010).129. O.C.G.A. § 9-11-68(b).130. Id.131. Id.132. 295 Ga. 469, 759 S.E.2d 804 (2014), reconsideration denied (Ju......
-
When Wrong Is Right: Stare Decisis in the Supreme Court of Georgia
...378, 418 S.E.2d 27, 30 (1992) (Benham, J., concurring) (quoting Crumbley, 243 Ga. At 349, 254 S.E.2d at 335 (Bowles, J. dissenting)). [41] 287 Ga. 23, 694 S.E.2d 83 (2010). [42] Id. at 31, 694 S.E.2d at 89 (Nahmias, J., dissenting) (quoting Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310, 377 (2010) (......
-
Local Government Law
...in original) (quoting Colon, 294 Ga. at 95, 751 S.E.2d at 310). 92. Id. at 470-71, 759 S.E.2d at 807 (quoting Smith v. Baptiste, 287 Ga. 23, 29, 694 S.E.2d 83, 88 (2010)).93. Id. at 476, 759 S.E.2d at 811 (emphasis in original).94. 331 Ga. App. 528, 771 S.E.2d 201 (2015).95. Id. at 532, 771......
-
Trial Practice and Procedure - Kate S. Cook, Alan J. Hamilton, Brandon L. Peak, John C. Morrison Iii, and Mary K. Weeks
...(citations omitted) (quoting Vaughn v. Pleasent, 266 Ga. 862, 864, 471 S.E.2d 866, 868 (1996)). 81. Id. at 755-56, 694 S.E.2d at 679. 82. 287 Ga. 23, 694 S.E.2d 83 (2010). 83. O.C.G.A. § 9-11-68 (2006). 84. Baptiste, 287 Ga. at 28-29, 694 S.E.2d at 87-88. 85. Ga. S. Bill 3 at § 5, 2005 Ga. ......