Smith v. Brewer, 78-1109

Decision Date22 June 1978
Docket NumberNo. 78-1109,78-1109
Citation577 F.2d 466
PartiesWalter SMITH, Jr., Appellant, v. Lou V. BREWER, Warden, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

John C. Wellman and Robert R. Rigg, Des Moines, Iowa, on brief for appellant.

Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen., and Thomas D. McGrane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Des Moines, Iowa, on brief for appellee.

Before STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge, INGRAHAM, * Senior Circuit Judge and HENLEY, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Walter Smith, Jr. appeals from the district court's 1 denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

On March 20, 1973, appellant Smith was convicted in Polk County District Court in Iowa of first degree murder. Smith appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court of Iowa on two grounds: (1) the evidence was not sufficient to support a first degree murder conviction, and (2) jury misconduct deprived him of a fair trial. The Supreme Court of Iowa rejected both arguments and affirmed Smith's conviction. State v. Smith, 240 N.W.2d 693 (Iowa 1976).

Smith then filed the instant action in federal district court seeking a writ of habeas corpus. Smith alleged that jury misconduct deprived him of his Sixth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to be tried by an impartial jury and to confront witnesses against him. The district court, in a well-reasoned opinion, denied appellant Smith's application for a writ of habeas corpus. Smith v. Brewer, 444 F.Supp. 482 (S.D.Iowa 1978). This appeal followed.

Smith argues, as he did below, that several incidents which took place during jury deliberations violated his Sixth Amendment right to a fair and impartial jury. These incidents include (1) pressures brought on one juror by other jurors; (2) possible intrusion of racial considerations into the jury's deliberations; (3) one or more juror's comments concerning the belief that Smith was likely to commit future violent crime unless convicted; (4) an indication that one juror compared Smith's case with an earlier trial in which the same juror had served; (5) an indication that the jury used against Smith the fact that he was on bail; and (6) an alleged wager among jurors whether one particular juror would break her promise to vote guilty after hearing certain evidence repeated.

The district court addressed each of these contentions in its published opinion. Upon a careful consideration of the record and of the briefs of the parties, we have...

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • Com. v. Tavares
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 29, 1982
    ...(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012, 101 S.Ct. 570, 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980); Smith v. Brewer, 444 F.Supp. 482 (S.D.Iowa), aff'd, 577 F.2d 466 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 967, 99 S.Ct. 457, 58 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978). See also 3 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Evidence, par. 606(04) (1981).Nev......
  • State v. Quesinberry, 95A88
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 26, 1989
    ...67 (1982) (juror allegedly threatened by foreman and coerced into verdict); Smith v. Brewer, 444 F.Supp. 482 (S.D.Iowa), aff'd, 577 F.2d 466 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 967, 99 S.Ct. 457, 58 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978) (juror alleged that other jurors told her she would be responsible if defe......
  • US v. Boylan
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • October 11, 1988
    ...rule, rather than the exception, and is not competent to impeach a verdict"); Smith v. Brewer, 444 F.Supp. 482 (S.D. Iowa), aff'd 577 F.2d 466 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 967, 99 S.Ct. 457, 58 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978) (quotes with approval above language from Gereau); U.S. v. Kimberlin, 52......
  • Estate of Casillas v. City of Fresno
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • July 2, 2019
    ...record was external because it was based on extrinsic facts); see also Smith v. Brewer, 444 F. Supp. 482, 490 (S.D. Iowa), aff'd, 577 F.2d 466 (8th Cir. 1978) ("To the extent the evidence may show that the jurors had an opportunity to use the facts in another case as a measuring rod for pet......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT