Smith v. Chen, 2013-2008

Decision Date26 March 2014
Docket NumberNO. 2013-2008,2013-2008
Citation138 Ohio St.3d 1447,5 N.E.3d 666
PartiesSmith v. Chen
CourtOhio Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

Franklin App. No. 12AP–1027, 2013-Ohio-4931.

Pfeifer and O'Donnell, JJ., dissent.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • December 7, 2016
    ...video created only for impeachment purposes violates the attorney-work-product doctrine of Civ.R. 26(B)(3). 138 Ohio St.3d 1447, 2014-Ohio-1182, 5 N.E.3d 666. We later ordered the parties to show cause why the matter should not have been dismissed for lack of a final, appealable order pursu......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT