Smith v. Collin

Decision Date16 October 1978
Docket NumberNo. 77-1736,77-1736
Citation58 L.Ed.2d 264,99 S.Ct. 291,439 U.S. 916
PartiesAlbert SMITH, President of the Village of Skokie, Illinois, et al. v. Frank COLLIN et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice BLACKMUN, with whom Mr. Justice WHITE joins, dissenting.

It is a matter of regret for me that the Court denies certiorari in this case, for this is litigation that rests upon critical, disturbing, and emotional facts, and the issues cut down to the very heart of the First Amendment.

The village of Skokie, Ill., a suburb of Chicago, in 1974 had a population of approximately 70,000 persons. A majority were Jewish; of the Jewish population a substantial number were survivors of World War II persecution. In March 1977, respondents Collin and the National Socialist Party of America, which Collin described as a "Nazi organization," publicly announced plans to hold an assembly in front of the Skokie Village Hall. On May 2, the village enacted three ordinances. The first established a permit system for parades and public assemblies and required applicants to post public liability and property damage insurance. The second prohibited the dissemination of material that incited racial or religious hatred with intent so to incite. The third prohibited public demonstrations by members of political parties while wearing military-style uniforms.

On June 22, respondent Collin applied for a permit under the first ordinance. His application stated that a public assembly would take place on July 4, would consist of persons demonstrating in front of the Village Hall, would last about a half hour, and would not disrupt traffic. It also stated that the participants would wear uniforms with swastikas and would carry placards proclaiming free speech for white persons, but would not distribute handbills or literature. The permit was denied.

Skokie's Village Hall stood on a street that was zoned commercial. There were residential areas, however, adjoining to the North, South, and West. The front of the Village Hall was visible from dwellings in those areas.

Upon the rejection of the permit application, respondents filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the president of the village of Skokie, its manager, its corporation counsel, and the village itself. Respondents asked that the ordinances be declared void and their enforcement enjoined. The District Court, after receiving evidence, ruled that the ordinances were unconstitutional on their face, and granted the requested declaratory and injunctive relief. It filed a comprehensive opinion. 447 F.Supp. 676 (1978). The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, with one judge dissenting in part, affirmed. 578 F.2d 1197 (1978).

A permit then was issued to respondents for a demonstration on the afternoon of June 25, 1978, in front of the Village Hall. Respondents, however, shifted their assembly from Skokie to Chicago where activities took place on June 24 and July 9.

Other aspects of the controversy already have reached this Court. In April 1977, the Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill., entered an injunction against respondents prohibiting them, within the village, from parading in the National Socialist uniform, displaying the swastika, or displaying materials that incite or promote hatred against persons of the Jewish or any other faith. The Illinois Appellate Court denied an application for stay pending appeal. The Supreme Court of Illinois, in turn, denied a stay and also denied leave for an expedited appeal. Relief was sought here. This Court, per curiam but by a divided vote, reversed the denial of a stay and remanded the case for further proceedings. National Socialist Party v. Skokie, 432 U.S. 43, 97 S.Ct. 2348, 53 L.Ed.2d 320 (1977).

On remand, the Illinois Appellate Court reviewed and modified the injunction the Circuit Court had entered and this time upheld only that portion thereof that prevented the display of swastikas "in the course of a demonstration, march, or parade." Village of Skokie v. National Socialist Party, 51 Ill.App.3d 279, 295, 9 Ill.Dec. 90, 102, 366 N.E.2d 347, 359 (1977). The Supreme Court of Illinois denied an application for stay pending expedited review. Mr. Justice STEVENS, as Circuit...

To continue reading

Request your trial
68 cases
  • Kreisner v. City of San Diego
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 3 Marzo 1993
    ...California, 403 U.S. 15, 91 S.Ct. 1780, 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971); Collin v. Smith, 578 F.2d 1197 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 916, 99 S.Ct. 291, 58 L.Ed.2d 264 (1978). I can't see how the fear that The Establishment Clause, as the name suggests, forbids only the establishment of religion......
  • Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service v. Babin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • 22 Julio 1992
    ...not, consistent with the First Amendment, prohibit Nazi party from marching in front of Village Hall), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 916, 99 S.Ct. 291, 58 L.Ed.2d 264 (1978). As noted, the First Amendment does not permit unbridled expression. To the extent that a protest campaign is disruptive or ......
  • Aguilar v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 2 Agosto 1999
    ...Party v. Skokie (1977) 432 U.S. 43, 97 S.Ct. 2205, 53 L.Ed.2d 96; see also Collin v. Smith (1978) 578 F.2d 1197, cert. den. 439 U.S. 916, 99 S.Ct. 291, 58 L.Ed.2d 264.) In each instance, racist and discriminatory views are being expressed. Nevertheless, these expressions are protected by th......
  • Finzer v. Barry, 84-5327
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 9 Septiembre 1986
    ...and Ku Klux Klan rallies. See Collin v. Smith, 578 F.2d 1197 (7th Cir.) (Nazi rally in Skokie, Illinois), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 916, 99 S.Ct. 291, 58 L.Ed.2d 264 (1978); Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, 578 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir.1978) (Ku Klux Klan rally). The ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Targeted hate speech and the first amendment: how the supreme court should have decided Snyder.
    • United States
    • Suffolk University Law Review Vol. 46 No. 1, February - February 2013
    • 1 Febrero 2013
    ...Cir. 1978). (42.) See Downs, supra note 1, at 68-78. The Supreme Court refused to intervene and denied certiorari. See Smith v. Collin, 439 U.S. 916 (1978) (denying (43.) See Collin, 578 F.2d at 1207. (44.) See Downs, supra note 1, at 57, 78-79. (45.) Id. at 80 (noting that Collin "did not ......
  • Centering Noncitizens' Free Speech
    • United States
    • University of Georgia School of Law Georgia Law Review (FC Access) No. 56-4, 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...578 F.2d 1197, 1207 (7th Cir.) (finding a First Amendment right for a Nazi group to hold a rally in Skokie, Illinois), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 916 (1978); see also, e.g., Edward L. Rubin, Nazis, Skokie, and the First Amendment as Virtue, 74 Calif. L. Rev. 233, 239-240 (1986) (praising First ......
  • Banning hate speech and the sticks and stones defense.
    • United States
    • Constitutional Commentary Vol. 13 No. 1, March 1996
    • 22 Marzo 1996
    ...Sherwin, who commented extensively and perceptively on several drafts. (1.) Collin v. Smith, 578 F.2d 1197 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 916 (1978). (2.) See, e.g., Doe v. University of Michigan, 721 F. Supp. 852 (E.D. Mich. 1989). (3.) Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. [section......
  • Imperialism and Black Dissent.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 75 No. 2, February 2023
    • 1 Febrero 2023
    ...11-14 (First Vintage Books ed. 1976) (1975). (384.) 578 F.2d 1197, 1199 (7th Cir. 1978). (385.) See id. at 1201. (386.) Smith v. Collin, 439 U.S. 916, 916 (387.) See Kenneth L. Karst, Equality as a Central Principle in the First Amendment, 43 U. CHI. L. REV. 20, 20-21 (1975). For a critique......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT