Smith v. Davis, No. 17-15874

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtTHOMAS, Chief Judge
Citation931 F.3d 829 (Mem)
Parties Anthony Bernard SMITH, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ron DAVIS, Respondent-Appellee.
Docket NumberNo. 17-15874
Decision Date15 July 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Smith v. Davis, No. 17-15874
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • March 20, 2020
    ...for a petitioner to be eligible for equitable tolling. See Smith v. Davis , 740 Fed. App'x 131 (9th Cir. 2018), reh’g en banc granted , 931 F.3d 829 (9th Cir. 2019).II. Standard of Review We review de novo the dismissal of a federal habeas petition as untimely, including "whether the statut......
  • K.W.P. v. Kan. City Pub. Sch., No. 17-3602
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • August 1, 2019
    ...In Gray , the Eleventh Circuit concluded that "[e]very reasonable officer would have known that handcuffing a compliant nine-year-old 931 F.3d 829 child for purely punitive purposes is unreasonable." 458 F.3d at 1307 (emphases added). In C.B. , the Ninth Circuit similarly concluded that "[i......
2 cases
  • Smith v. Davis, No. 17-15874
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • March 20, 2020
    ...for a petitioner to be eligible for equitable tolling. See Smith v. Davis , 740 Fed. App'x 131 (9th Cir. 2018), reh’g en banc granted , 931 F.3d 829 (9th Cir. 2019).II. Standard of Review We review de novo the dismissal of a federal habeas petition as untimely, including "whether the statut......
  • K.W.P. v. Kan. City Pub. Sch., No. 17-3602
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • August 1, 2019
    ...In Gray , the Eleventh Circuit concluded that "[e]very reasonable officer would have known that handcuffing a compliant nine-year-old 931 F.3d 829 child for purely punitive purposes is unreasonable." 458 F.3d at 1307 (emphases added). In C.B. , the Ninth Circuit similarly concluded that "[i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT