Smith v. Estate of Gilbert, 56,005

Decision Date19 November 1986
Docket NumberNo. 56,005,56,005
PartiesRoosevelt SMITH, Individually as Representative and Administrator of the Estate of Rosie Lee Smith, a/k/a Rosie Lee Shorter, a/k/a Rosie Lee Jones v. ESTATE OF Louis S. GILBERT, III, Deceased, and Frank Foster, Administrator.
CourtMississippi Supreme Court

Tyree Irving, Walls, Buck & Irving, Greenville, for appellant.

Andrew N. Alexander, III, Lake, Tindall, Hunger & Thackston, Greenville, for appellee.

Before HAWKINS, P.J., and PRATHER and ROBERTSON, JJ.

HAWKINS, Presiding Justice, for the Court:

The estate of Rosie Lee Smith, a/k/a Rosie Lee Shorter, a/k/a Rosie Lee Jones, appeals from a directed verdict and judgment entered thereon in the circuit court of Coahoma County against the estate of Louis S. Gilbert, III, arising out of the head-on motor vehicle accident in that county. Finding sufficient evidence was adduced to survive such motion, we reverse and remand for trial.

FACTS

The Friar's Point Road in Coahoma County runs generally in a north-south direction. Its asphalt surface is approximately eighteen feet wide. Just after midnight on October 4, 1981, Rosie Lee Smith, with the above aliases, was riding as a guest passenger in a 1977 Dodge van being driven south on this road by Pearlie Mae Townsend. Sitting between these two ladies on a milk crate was James Jackson. All were Tunica county citizens.

Gilbert was driving a 1976 GMC pickup truck north on this road. In the rear of the pickup was Honda three-wheeler.

The van and the pickup collided on the Friar's Point Road close by the Coahoma County Junior College.

Gilbert and Ms. Townsend were killed instantly, while Rosie lived in a comatose state until January 10, 1983, when she too departed this life intestate. Roosevelt Smith, a legal representative and administrator of Rosie's estate, filed suit in the Coahoma County circuit court against the estate of Gilbert for Rosie's wrongful death. Frank P. Foster, chancery clerk of Coahoma County, was the appointed administrator of Gilbert's estate.

Except for Jackson there were no eyewitnesses to the accident, and Jackson was amnesic insofar as recalling how the accident occurred.

At trial only two witnesses testified as to the scene of the accident. Billy S. Helton, the first to arrive, testified to seeing glass, gas and oil all over the highway. Glass was scattered all about. A "windshield" was north of the pickup, and the three-wheeler was north of the pickup on the edge of the highway, according to him.

Helton drew a diagram in which he positioned the pickup straddled across the center of the road, headed in a slightly southwest direction, and the van off on the west shoulder, headed slightly northeast. The glass was marked as scattered on both sides of the road. Helton positioned the "windshield" in the center of the east lane just north of the pickup, and the three-wheeler off on a shoulder on the east side.

Andrew Thompson, Jr., Coahoma County deputy sheriff, was the investigating officer, attending to the victims and supervising clearing of the wreckage. He was there that night, and returned the next day to take pictures of the road. He said there was a dim and faded median line.

Thompson described the pickup as across the road, its front pointed west, and the front part of the cab, approximately four feet, extending over onto the west lane. The rear glass of the pickup was in the grass on the east shoulder, the three-wheeler was three to four feet north of the pickup in the east lane. The van was on the west shoulder with its front end about twelve inches from the pavement. Anti-freeze, transmission oil and glass were in the road, with the largest concentration in the west lane.

Thompson also observed what he took to be a fresh gouge mark in the west lane just south of the pickup. Thompson visited the scene the following April preparatory to giving a deposition and was unable to find the gouge mark, although the pavement had not been resurfaced.

Thompson made a drawing on a large cardboard sheet of the scene as he found it that night. The drawing shows the pickup at right angles across the center of the road, headed west, with its front end across the centerline into the west lane a few feet. Also, around the south side of the front end of the pickup, and west of the front end of the pickup the drawing shows a concentration of anti-freeze, transmission fluid, oil, glass, molding, grill and debris. This concentration is shown just over into the west lane of the road. Or, put another way, this concentration is on the east side of the west lane of the road. The gouge mark on the drawing extends from the front left end of the pickup...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Hickox By and Through Hickox v. Holleman, 56004
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • January 21, 1987
    ...light most favorable to the plaintiff and indulge all reasonable inferences which will support plaintiffs' cause. See Smith v. Estate of Gilbert, 498 So.2d 823 (Miss.1986); Evans v. Journeay, 488 So.2d 797, 799 (Miss.1986); White v. Hancock Bank, 477 So.2d 265, 269 (Miss.1985); Edwards v. C......
  • Mississippi Valley Gas Co. v. Estate of Walker
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • August 6, 1998
    ...evidence should be taken from the jury." BFGoodrich, Inc. v. Taylor, 509 So.2d 895, 904 (Miss. 1987) (citing Smith v. Estate of Gilbert, 498 So.2d 823 (Miss.1986); Douglas v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 405 So.2d 107 (Miss.1981); Cameron v. Hootsell, 229 Miss. 80, 90 So.2d 195 ¶ 22. We find ......
  • Scott v. Transport Indem. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • September 2, 1987
    ...could have found for Scott. See, e.g., Hickox By and Through Hickox v. Holleman, 502 So.2d 626, 628 (Miss.1987); Smith v. Estate of Gilbert, 498 So.2d 823, 825 (Miss.1986); Evans v. Journeay, 488 So.2d 797, 799 (Miss.1986); White v. Hancock Bank, 477 So.2d 265, 269 In any case such as this,......
  • BFGoodrich, Inc. v. Taylor
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • June 3, 1987
    ...in rare and exceptional cases that a civil case depending upon circumstantial evidence should be taken from the jury. Smith v. Estate of Gilbert, 498 So.2d 823 (Miss.1986); Douglas v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., 405 So.2d 107 (Miss.1981); Cameron v. Hootsell, 229 Miss. 80, 90 So.2d 195 W......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT