Smith v. Ferguson Trucking Co., 5855
| Decision Date | 26 November 1954 |
| Docket Number | No. 5855,5855 |
| Citation | 1954 NMSC 115,58 N.M. 779,276 P.2d 911 |
| Parties | Carrie Belle SMITH, Administratrix de bonis non of the Estate of William Elbert Smith, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FERGUSON TRUCKING COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | New Mexico Supreme Court |
Bean & Osborn, Roswell, for appellant.
Cowan & Schubert, Hobbs, for appellee.
Appeal is from directed verdict in favor of appellee and judgment entered thereon following appellant's motion at the close of appellee's case.
Appellant, administratrix of the estate of William Elbert Smith, deceased, sued appellee for the wrongful death of her husband, said death having resulted from a highway accident in which the automobile operated by the decedent hit a tractor and trailer rig owned and operated by appellee.
Appellant's witnesses testified to the following relevant facts: At dusk, decedent was driving his car east on U. S. Highway No. 380, unaccompanied. The accident occurred at a 'T' intersection of State Road 294 with the U. S. Highway. The State Road comes to the 'T' intersection from the north; on the side of the U. S. Highway opposite the intersection of the State Road there is a cattle guard for a pasture road from the U S. Highway out into the fields.
At the trial, no eyewitness of the event was offered. The trailer on appellee's truck was loaded with heavy drilling pipe. From the position of the truck after the accident, it appears that, at the moment of impact, the tractor was entering the cattle guard on the south of the U. S. Highway for the purpose of pulling its load out into the fields to the south. The trailer, loaded with pipe, extended back onto the blacktop of the U. S. Highway, and the pipe itself extended a foot or two across the center line of the highway; thus, the righthand and proper lane of travel for the appellant going east was completely blocked by appellee's rig. Appellant's car struck appellee's rig between the tractor and the trailer wheels while appellant was still in his own lane of traffic and proper place on the road; that is, he struck about in the center of the trailer, breaking the connecting pole between tractor and trailer.
There was some evidence that decedent's car had its parking lights burning. There was no evidence as to whether or not lights were burning on the truck at the time of the accident nor was there any evidence that the time of day or visibility required lights. Finally, there was no evidence to indicate whether appellee's truck came to the point of impact from the east, from the west, or from the north.
Appellant relies on a single point, namely, that the trial court erred in directing the jury to return a verdict in favor of appellee at the close of appellant's case. The controlling law has been stated in numerous cases: Cavazos v. Geronimo Bus Lines, 1952, 56 N.M. 624, 247 P.2d 865; Chandler v. Battenfield, 1951, 55 N.M. 361, 233 P.2d 1047; Dickerson v. Montoya, 1940, 44 N.M. 207, 100 P.2d 904; Lopez v. Townsend, 1938, 42 N.M. 601, 82 P.2d 921; and others. In Chandler v. Battenfield, supra, this Court stated [55 N.M. 361, 233 P.2d 1050]:
'In the consideration of a motion for a directed verdict the court must view a plaintiff's evidence in the most favorable aspect, indulging in all...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Garcia v. Sanchez
...which tends to weaken or disprove it must be disregarded. Ferris v. Thomas Drilling Co., 62 N.M. 283, 309 P.2d 225; Smith v. Ferguson Trucking Co., 58 N.M. 779, 276 P.2d 911; Thompson v. Dale, 59 N.M. 290, 283 P.2d 623.' [66 N.M. 485, 349 P.2d We further held that the proof offered was suff......
-
State v. Maestas
...inference. In such a case, the party has failed to make a prima facie case. Smith v. Ferguson Trucking Co., 1954-NMSC-115, ¶ 7, 58 N.M. 779, 276 P.2d 911 (holding that speculation as to cause is not evidence upon which a verdict can be based).D. Excluding Evidence Was Proper{18} The State a......
-
Ferris v. Thomas Drilling Co.
...inferences to be drawn from plaintiff's evidence, and disregarding all unfavorable testimony and inferences. Smith v. Ferguson Trucking Co., 58 N.M. 779, 276 P.2d 911. And, only where there is no evidence for jury to pass upon or where evidence is of such character that the court, in exerci......
-
Wahlin v. Shelby
...a verdict. If not, the ruling was correct. Jones v. New Mexico School of Mines, 75 N.M. 326, 404 P.2d 289; Smith v. Ferguson Trucking Company, 58 N.M. 779, 276 P.2d 911; Ferris v. Thomas Drilling Company, 62 N.M. 283, 309 P.2d The plaintiff, together with two of his brothers, went to San Ju......