Smith v. First Am. Bank & Trust Co.
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | BELL |
| Citation | Smith v. First Am. Bank & Trust Co., 228 S.E.2d 227, 139 Ga.App. 292 (Ga. App. 1976) |
| Decision Date | 09 July 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 52282,No. 1,52282,1 |
| Parties | B. L. SMITH et al. v. FIRST AMERICAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY |
Bryant & Stone, George H. Bryant, Danielsville, for appellants.
Cook, Noell, Bates & Warnes, J. Vincent Cook, Athens, for appellee.
Plaintiff brought this suit to recover a deficiency balance allegedly due on an installment note and security agreement, plus interest and attorney fees. The case arose out of defendant Bobby Lee Smith's purchase of a mobile home. His parents, the other defendants, according to the complaint, guaranteed payment of the note and security agreement. The defendant son set up the affirmative defense of accord and satisfaction and the other defendants pleaded that there signatures to the guaranty were obtained by specified acts of fraud and misrepresentation of plaintiff and that the guaranty failed for lack of consideration. The plaintiff moved for summary judgment which the trial...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Bradley v. Tattnall Bank
...having the burden, as movant, on summary judgment, including the burden to negate properly pled defenses. Smith v. First Am. Bank etc. Co., 139 Ga.App. 292, 228 S.E.2d 227. The argument was made that "there was somehow some burden upon defendant, even though he was the nonmoving party, to d......
-
Zagoria v. Dubose Enterprises, Inc.
...by a jury, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees DuBose and First Bank. Smith v. First American etc. Co., 139 Ga.App. 292, 228 S.E.2d 227 (1976). "Our ruling is that [appellees have] not met [their] procedural burden under Code Ann. § 81A-156 and 'does not......
-
Peppers v. Siefferman
...as moving party for summary judgment, had the burden of piercing appellant's affirmative defense. Smith v. First American Bank etc., Co., 139 Ga.App. 292, 228 S.E.2d 227 (1976); Stratton & McLendon, Inc. v. Cameron-Brown Co., 140 Ga.App. 430, 231 S.E.2d 447 (1976). Appellee argues that this......
-
Stratton & McLendon, Inc. v. Cameron-Brown Co.
...to carry its burden by not piercing nor even addressing the affirmative defenses raised by defendants. See Smith v. First American Bank & Trust Co., 139 Ga.App. 292, 228 S.E.2d 227; C. K. Security Systems, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 137 Ga.App. 159, 223 S.E.2d 453; Barker v.......