Smith v. Hartman, 79-6015
Decision Date | 26 September 1979 |
Docket Number | No. 79-6015,79-6015 |
Parties | Smith v. Hartman |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED
To continue reading
Request your trial4 cases
-
Carter v. Hutto, 85-6008
...corpus ad testificandum for plaintiff's failure to comply with a pretrial order, the noncompliance was clearly willful. In Smith v. Hartman, 609 F.2d 510 (4 Cir.1979), Smith refused to declare under oath before the magistrate that his proposed witnesses were prepared to give relevant testim......
-
Orpiano v. Johnson
...of confinement and was properly referred to a magistrate over the prisoner's objections under § 636(b)(1)(B). See Smith v. Hartman, 609 F.2d 510 (4th Cir. 1979). See also Coleman v. Hutto, 500 F.Supp. 586 A more detailed discussion of the issue was made by the Seventh Circuit in Hill v. Jen......
-
Coleman v. Hutto, Civ. A. No. 80-0221-R.
...to make a recommendation to the Court in prisoner cases is entirely independent of the consent of the parties. See Smith v. Hartman, 609 F.2d 510 (4th Cir. 1979) (unpub.) (copy attached); compare 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § In the event the district j......
-
Lugenbeel v. Schutte, Civ. No. Y-84-1262.
...be referred to a magistrate despite the parties' objections. Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44 (4th Cir.1982); see Smith v. Hartman, 609 F.2d 510 (4th Cir. 1979) (unpublished). Those cases did not involve jury trials, In Coleman v. Hutto, 500 F.Supp. 586 (E.D.Va.1980), the Eastern District of......