Smith v. Hayes
Decision Date | 13 September 1971 |
Citation | 281 A.2d 276,59 N.J. 236 |
Parties | Petition of Thomas F. X. SMITH, Municipal Clerk of the City of Jersey City in re Special Election of the City of Jersey City, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Francis X. HAYES, Defendant-Appellant. Anthony CARBONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George F. KUGLER, Defendant-Respondent. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Francis X. Hayes, pro se.
Louis P. Caroselli, Second Assistant CorporationCounsel, for respondent, Smith (James F. Ryan, CorporationCounsel, attorney).
Arnold Jay Gold, Elizabeth, N.J., for appellant, Carbone.
Alfred L. Nardelli, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent, Atty. Gen. (George F. Kugler, Jr., Atty. Gen., Stephen Skillman, Asst. Atty. Gen., on the brief).
These are election matters and because of the inherent time limitations, we heard argument on petitions for certification as if they had been granted.Certification is granted and the matters remanded for further proceedings in accordance herewith.
The single question is whether N.J.S.A. 19:13--7 is arbitrary in its request that the signatures on a nominating petition shall be supported by the affidavits of 5 of the signers that they'saw all the signatures made thereto'.No criticism is levelled against the requirement for verification as such but it is insisted that to demand five such affiants serves no public purpose and is therefore unwarranted.We agree.The legitimate statutory objective may be met by a single verification, and the statute will be construed to require such verification and no more.This result brings the statute into harmony with other statutory provisions dealing with the verification of nominating petitions.
Mr. Justice MOUNTAIN votes to affirm for the reasons expressed in the opinions of...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Coleman v. Wilson
...Sutherland, Statutory Construction (Horack 3d ed. 1943) § 2412, p. 189. (at pp. 202--203, 254 A.2d at p. 529) See also, In re Smith, 59 N.J. 236, 237, 281 A.2d 278 (1971). The intention of the Legislature was to forbid obscene matter to the fullest extent permissible under the First Amendme......
-
Petition of Hartnett
... ... See, E. g., In re Smith, 59 N.J. 236, 281 A.2d 525 (1971); Wene v. Meyner, 13 N.J. 185, 98 A.2d 573 (1953); Kilmurray v. Gilfert, 10 N.J. 435, 440, 91 A.2d 865 (1952); In re ... ...
-
Atlantic County Bd. of Elections, In re
...expressed by the action of voting itself. (Wene v. Meyner, Supra, at 193--194, 98 A.2d at 576.) More recently, in In re Smith, 59 N.J. 236, 237, 281 A.2d 276 (1971), the Supreme Court, contrary to the requirements of N.J.S.A. 19:13--7 that the signatures on nominating petitions be supported......
-
Friends of Jim Usry for Mayor Campaign v. Matthews for Mayor Campaign
...render an election void for technical reasons." Kilmurray v. Gilfert, 10 N.J. 435, 440, 91 A.2d 865 (1952). See, also, In re Smith, 59 N.J. 236, 237, 281 A.2d 276 (1971); In re Atlantic Cty. Election Bd., 117 N.J.Super. 244, 250, 284 A.2d 368 Somewhat analogous to the present case is Wene v......