Smith v. Holloway

Decision Date17 June 1890
CitationSmith v. Holloway, 124 Ind. 329, 24 N.E. 886 (Ind. 1890)
PartiesSmith v. Holloway.
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from circuit court, Pike county; O. M. Welborn, Judge.

E. A. Ely and J. W. Wilson, for appellant. F. B. Posey, for appellee.

Elliott, J.

The appellee alleges in his complaint that in August, 1869, he was the owner of a tract of land; that prior to that date he granted a right of way for the construction of a railroad to the Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Railroad Company; that the company constructed an embankment; that on the day named he conveyed to Granville Carlisle all of the tracts lying south and east of the right of way; that by a series of conveyances the defendant became the owner of the parcel conveyed to Carlisle; that on the 15th day of August, 1885, the appellee sold to the appellant a strip of land for a road 15 feet in width; that there is a spring from which a stream of water constantly flows; that this stream crosses the strip granted the appellant, and runs along the south line of the embankment, and into the inclosed land of the appellant; that on the 1st day of June, 1885, an agreement was made between the appellee and the appellant under which they erected a partition fence on the top of the embankment; that for more than 15 years before the agreement was entered into the appellee had used and enjoyed the stream; that it was agreed that the appellee's right to have the stream flow into his field should never be disturbed; that the partition fence should never be so changed as to interfere...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • Miceli v. Foley
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • July 2, 1990
    ...easement merely, and the fee remains in the grantor.' Jones on Easements, supra, sec. 211; 33 CYC 'Railroads,'- age 169; Smith v. Holloway, 124 Ind. 329, 24 N.E. 886." Id. 179 Md. at 572-73, 20 A.2d See also East Wash. Railway v. Brooke, 244 Md. 287, 293-294, 223 A.2d 599 (1966), and Annot.......
  • Utah Copper Co. v. Stephen Hayes Estate, Inc.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • March 28, 1934
    ... ... R. Co. v. San ... Francisco Sav. Union , 146 Cal. 290, 79 P. 961, 70 L.R.A ... 221, 106 Am. St. Rep. 36, 2 Ann. Cas. 962; Smith v ... Holloway , 124 Ind. 329, 24 N.E. 886; ... Consumers' Gas. Tr. Co. v. American Plate ... Glass Co. , 162 Ind. 393, 68 N.E. 1020; ... ...
  • Hefty v. All Other Members of the Certified Settlement Class
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • June 2, 1997
    ...to what the parties might have intended by the words they used in this conveyance.Brown, 510 N.E.2d at 644.12 See also Smith v. Holloway, 124 Ind. 329, 24 N.E. 886 (1890); The Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Ry. Co. v. Geisel, 119 Ind. 77, 21 N.E. 470 (1889); Quick v. Taylor, ......
  • Consolidated Rail Corp., Inc. v. Lewellen
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • June 19, 1997
    ...terminates the interest, so that the exclusive rights over the land revert to the owner of the fee simple"). Cf. Smith v. Holloway, 124 Ind. 329, 330, 24 N.E. 886, 887 (1890)(when owner of land only grants easement, grantor remains the owner in fee and may make all lawful use of the land bu......
  • Get Started for Free