Smith v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole
| Decision Date | 11 August 2016 |
| Docket Number | No. 224 MAL 2016. |
| Citation | 143 A.3d 891 (Mem) |
| Parties | Derek SMITH, Respondent v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Petitioner. |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Does the Commonwealth Court's decision conflict with this Court's decision in Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole?
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Smith v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole
...and we granted review to determine whether the Commonwealth Court's decision conflicts with our decision in Gaito. Smith v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 143 A.3d 891 (Pa. 2016). The Board maintains "[a]lthough there are hundreds of Commonwealth Court decisions addressing various fact patterns......
- Riede v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole
- Commonwealth v. Lutz-Morrison