Smith v. Smith

Docket Number44970,45069
Decision Date12 June 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • State v. Shanahan
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • July 11, 2019
    ...of res judicata from arguing them again before this Court."Res judicata consists of claim and issue preclusion." Smith v. Smith , 164 Idaho 46, 50, 423 P.3d 998, 1002 (2018). "The question of whether an action is barred by res judicata is a question of law over which we exercise free review......
  • Alpha Mortg. Fund Ii, an Idaho Ltd. v. Drinkard
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • October 13, 2021
    ...involving Drinkards’ counsel Mr. Smith, this Court noted that a judgment need not be recorded to be valid. See Smith v. Smith II , 164 Idaho 46, 52, 423 P.3d 998, 1004 (2018). In Smith II , this Court made clear, "[a]s an initial matter, there is no requirement that a judgment be recorded a......
  • Medrain v. Lee
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • April 17, 2020
    ...must be automatically dismissed, either upon motion of a party or [by] sua sponte action by the district court." Smith v. Smith , 164 Idaho 46, 52, 423 P.3d 998, 1004 (2018) (quoting Vierstra v. Vierstra , 153 Idaho 873, 877, 292 P.3d 264, 268 (2012) ). The interpretation of the Idaho Rules......
  • John Doe v. Jane Doe
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • February 4, 2020
  • Get Started for Free