Smith v. Smith

Decision Date01 July 1963
Docket NumberNo. 1147,1147
CitationSmith v. Smith, 156 So.2d 278 (La. App. 1963)
PartiesLaura SMITH v. Annabelle SMITH.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Louisiana

Cronvich, Ciaccio, Wambsgans & Perry, Philip C. Ciaccio, Metairie, for plaintiff-appellee.

Normann & Normann, Marvin C. Grodsky, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Before REGAN, YARRUT and SAMUEL, JJ.

YARRUT, Judge.

This is a summary proceeding in which Plaintiff seeks the eviction of Defendant from a dwelling on her property, which she permitted Defendant to occupy by sufferance. LSA-C.C.P. Arts. 4701--4705 and 4731--4735.

Defendant answered denying Plaintiff's ownership; admitted her occupancy, claiming Plaintiff had accepted $140.64 during the past six months as part payment of taxes and paving charges against the property; then asserted ownership of the rear building claiming it was built by her at a cost of $733.55, with the consent of her natural father, deceased husband of Plaintiff, in whose succession Plaintiff was recognized as owner of the property as part of the community; or, alternatively, for the recovery of the cost since Plaintiff unconditionally accepted the community and thereby bound herself for the debts.

From a judgment of eviction only, Defendant has taken this suspensive appeal.

During the trial the District Court refused to permit Defendant to prove she was a natural child of Plaintiff's husband, and as such was part owner of his half of the community; and also refused proof that she built and paid for the improvements, without reimbursement therefor.

Since Defendant admitted, on cross-examination, that she did not own the land, only the rear building thereon and had no fixed lease with Plaintiff, the District Court excluded evidence of her heirship, her ownership of the building involved, and what the cost was.

Having admitted s...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Todt v. Santani
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • July 15, 1964
    ...requirements of a petitory action. To hold otherwise would be to defeat the purpose and the clear intent of the law. Smith v. Smith, La.App., 156 So.2d 278; Lovecchio v. Graffagini, 90 So.2d 694; Clements v. Billiot, La.App., 52 So.2d 268; Ryan v. Barthelmy, La.App., 32 So.2d 467; Crabtree ......
  • Saint James Mission Church-Airport Rd. v. Annual Conference of the African Methodist Episcopal Church in Miss.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • December 21, 2017
    ...of the leased premises. Roussel v. Dalche, 158 La. 742, 104 So. 637 (1925), and authorities therein cited. See also Smith v. Smith, 156 So.2d 278 (La. App. 4th Cir. 1963). Equally well settled is the rule that a lessee cannot defeat his lessor's right to summary action for eviction by injec......
  • Vicknair v. Watson-Pitchford, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • July 11, 1977
    ...of the leased premises. Roussel v. Dalche, 158 La. 742, 104 So. 637 (1925), and authorities therein cited. See also Smith v. Smith, 156 So.2d 278 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1963). Equally well settled is the rule that a lessee cannot defeat his lessor's right to summary action for eviction by inject......
  • L & K Land, Inc. v. Billiot
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • February 22, 1983
    ...of the leased premises. Roussel v. Dalche, 158 La. 742, 104 So. 637 (1925), and authorities therein cited. See also Smith v. Smith, 156 So.2d 278 (La.App. 4th Cir.1963). Equally well settled is the rule that a lessee cannot defeat his lessor's right to summary action for eviction by injecti......