Smith v. Smith

Decision Date16 December 1982
Docket NumberNo. 53842,53842
Citation8 Kan.App.2d 252,655 P.2d 469
PartiesJudy Loraine SMITH, Appellant, v. Lawrence I. SMITH, Appellee.
CourtKansas Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court

In a case where the notice of appeal was filed more than thirty days after the filing of findings of fact and conclusions of law following a nonjury trial and the trial judge did not direct that the judgment be settled by journal entry, it is held the appeal was not timely taken and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

James W. Clark, Ottawa, for appellant.

Robert W. Green, of Green & Sachse, Chartered, Ottawa, for appellee.

Before REES, P.J., MEYER, J., and JAMES J. NOONE, District Judge Assigned.

REES, Judge:

Plaintiff has undertaken an appeal from rulings on a post-judgment motion filed by her for revival of alimony and past due child support awarded upon the parties' divorce in 1970. Defendant challenges our jurisdiction to hear this appeal on the ground plaintiff's notice of appeal was not timely filed. We find defendant's position to be correct and we therefore will not address the merits of the issues raised by plaintiff.

On January 8, 1981, following an evidentiary hearing, the trial judge filed with the clerk of the court written findings of fact and conclusions of law, and copies were served on the parties' attorneys. In pertinent part, the instrument filed and served read:

"The Court finds that child support for the period March 1, 1980, until Jill attains majority on January 3, 1981, is and shall be due and payable by the defendant.

....

"5. Plaintiff's [remarriage] ... was not a void marriage, and would at most be voidable. Defendant's obligation to pay alimony was not revived by the subsequent annulment of this remarriage....

....

"7. Defendant is obligated to pay $100 per month for the support of Jill for the period from March 1, 1980, to January 3, 1981, when she becomes eighteen, the age of majority. Judgment is entered for plaintiff against defendant for $1,010.00 accordingly plus any accrued or accruing costs."

Thereafter, on October 23, 1981, the following journal entry, approved by counsel for the parties, was filed:

"JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

"NOW on this 23rd day of October, 1981, the above captioned matter comes on for the entry of a Journal Entry of Judgment herein. Plaintiff appears by James W. Clark, her attorney. Defendant appears by Robert W. Green, his attorney.

"The Court being fully advised in the premises finds that judgment was entered on January 8, 1981, upon the filing of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law signed by the Court and filed with the Clerk on that date.

"IT IS BY THE COURT CONSIDERED ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that defendant was obligated to pay $100.00 per month for the support of Jill Smith for the period from March 1, 1980 to January 3, 1981, when she became eighteen years of age. Judgment was entered for plaintiff and against defendant for $1,010.00 accordingly plus any accrued or accruing court costs. This judgment was filed and became effective January 8, 1981.

"IT IS BY THE COURT SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

/s/ Floyd H. Coffman

District Judge"

Plaintiff's notice of appeal was filed October 30, 1981.

That part of K.S.A. 60-2103(a ) applicable to this case provides:

"When an appeal is permitted by law from a district court to an appellate court, the time within which an appeal may be taken shall be thirty (30) days from the entry of the judgment, as provided by K.S.A. 60-258 ....

"A party may appeal from a judgment by filing with the clerk of the district court a notice of appeal."

K.S.A. 60-258 provides:

"No judgment shall be effective unless and until a journal entry or judgment form is signed by the trial judge and filed with the clerk of the court. Where a judgment form is used it shall be substantially as follows:

[CASE CAPTION]

                                 JUDGMENT FORM
                  On this __ day of ________, 19 __, judgment
                is entered as follows
                      (Include here the judgment entered)
                -----------------------------------------------
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Marriage of Wilson, Matter of
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • 17 Febrero 1989
    ...entry. The Court of Appeals held entry of judgment did not take place until the journal entry was filed. See also Smith v. Smith, 8 Kan.App.2d 252, 655 P.2d 469 (1982)." Dubish, 234 Kan. at 714-15, 675 P.2d 877. (Emphasis The Dubish case involved the question of whether a criminal defendant......
  • State v. Dubish, 55505
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 13 Enero 1984
    ...entry. The Court of Appeals held entry of judgment did not take place until the journal entry was filed. See also Smith v. Smith, 8 Kan.App.2d 252, 655 P.2d 469 (1982). The entry of judgment in this case occurred on October 15, 1982, when the journal entry was signed by the judge and filed ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT