Smith v. State

Decision Date29 March 1983
Docket Number2 Div. 348
Citation435 So.2d 158
PartiesGary Wayne SMITH v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

J.L. Chestnut, Jr. of Chestnut, Sanders, Sanders & Turner, Selma, for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Martha Gail Ingram, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

BOWEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol. That conviction must be reversed because the information is void.

The information charged that the defendant "did commit the offense of Driving Under the Influence in violation of Section 32-5A-191 of the Code of Alabama." The information is fatally defective because it does not specify whether the defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol (Section 32-5A-191(a)(2), under the influence of a controlled substance (Section 32-5A-191(a)(3), or under the combined influence of alcohol and a controlled substance (Section 32-5A-191(a)(4). The information did not allege a criminal offense in that it failed to describe any offense condemned by Section 32-5A-191. People v. Sinsi, 57 Ill.App.3d 716, 15 Ill.Dec. 378, 373 N.E.2d 724 (1978); People v. Tucker, 131 Ill.App.2d 598, 268 N.E.2d 191 (1971); People v. Stringfield, 37 Ill.App.2d 344, 185 N.E.2d 381 (1962). See also Barbee v. State, 417 So.2d 611 (Ala.Cr.App.1982).

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the cause remanded.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DeCARLO, P.J., and TYSON and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • Boyle v. State, CR-09-0822
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 29, 2013
  • Boyle v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 29, 2013
  • Kinder v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 9, 1986
    ... ... The juvenile court is only authorized to make a finding of probable cause concerning the specific act leading to the delinquency petition before transferring the juvenile for trial in Circuit Court. Boyd v. State, Ala., 341 So.2d 680 (1977). See also Government of Virgin Islands v. Smith, 558 F.2d 691 (3 Cir.1977)." ...         Smith v. State, 368 So.2d 298, 301 (Ala.Cr.App.1978), writ quashed, 368 So.2d 305 (Ala.1979). (Emphasis added.) Thus, at a transfer hearing, the juvenile court is limited to determine whether probable cause exists concerning specific acts and ... ...
  • Young v. City of Hokes Bluff
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 27, 1992
    ...left to inference or aided by intendment." Corum v. City of Huntsville, 491 So.2d 1091, 1092 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). See also Smith v. State, 435 So.2d 158 (Ala.Cr.App.1983) (information that accused "did commit the offense of Driving Under the Influence in violation of Section 32-5A-191 of the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT