Smith v. State (In re Smith's Estate)

Decision Date07 December 1915
Citation155 N.W. 109,161 Wis. 588
PartiesIN RE SMITH'S ESTATE. SMITH v. STATE ET AL.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Circuit Court, Milwaukee County; F. C. Eschweiler, Judge.

In the matter of the estate of Allard J. Smith. From a judgment in favor of Pauline R. F. Smith, executrix, refusing to charge an inheritance tax upon the allowance to the widow for support of herself and the children pending administration, under Stats. 1913, § 3935, subd. 2, the State and the County of Milwaukee appeal. Affirmed.W. C. Owen, Atty. Gen., E. E. Brossard, Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. C. Zabel, Dist. Atty., of Milwaukee, for appellants.

Flanders, Bottum, Fawsett & Bottum, of Milwaukee, for respondent.

TIMLIN, J.

[1] The state and the county of Milwaukee appeal from a judgment refusing to charge an inheritance tax upon the transaction of giving and receiving an allowance to the widow for her support and that of the children pending the administration of the estate, under subdivision 2 of section 3935, Stats. 1913. Section 1087--1, Id., imposes an inheritance tax “upon any transfer of property, * * * when the transfer is by will or by the intestate laws of this state from any person dying possessed of the property while a resident of the state, * * *” or a nonresident leaving property within the jurisdiction of the state, “* * * or when the transfer is * * * by deed, grant, bargain, sale or gift, made in contemplation of the death of the grantor, vendor or donor, or intended to take effect in possession or enjoymentat or after such death,” or when the transfer is by exercise of a power of appointment. “The tax so imposed shall be upon the clear market value of such property * * * and only upon the excess of the exemptions hereinafter granted.” Section 1087--24 defines the word “property” as used above to mean:

“The real and personal property or interest therein of the testator, intestate, grantor, bargainor, vendor or donor, passing or transferred to individual legatees, devisees, heirs, next of kin, grantees, donees, vendees or successors, and shall include all personal property within or without the state.”

Also:

“The word ‘transfer,’ as used in section 1087--1 to 1087--24, inclusive, shall be taken to include the passing of property or any interest therein, in possession or enjoyment, present or future, by inheritance, descent, devise, succession, bequest, grant, deed, bargain and sale, gift or appointment in the manner herein described. * * *”

The allowance to the widow is not, first, a transfer by will or by the intestate laws of this state from any person; second, the property in question is not transferred to the widow as legatee, devisee, heir, next of kin, grantee, donee, vendee, or successor, but by order of the court acting under a statutory power and for the purpose of supporting...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Beck v. State
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • April 17, 1928
    ...frequently been invoked. State v. Thompson, 154 Wis. 320, 142 N. W. 647, 46 L. R. A. (N. S.) 790, Ann. Cas. 1915B, 1084;Estate of Smith, 161 Wis. 588, 155 N. W. 109;Estate of Week, 169 Wis. 316, 172 N. W. 732;Estate of Ebeling, 169 Wis. 432, 172 N. W. 734, 4 A. L. R. 1519;Estate of Stephens......
  • In re Wilson's Estate
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • April 8, 1936
    ...Page's Estate, 79 N.Y.Sup. 382; Crenshaw v. Moore, 124 Tenn. 528, 137 S.W. 924, 34 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1161, Ann.Cas.1913A, 165; Smith's Estate, 161 Wis. 588, 155 N.W. 109; In Estate of Steehler, 195 Cal. 386, 233 P. 972, 976; In re Green's Estate, 78 Utah, 139, 1 P.2d 968. Under the statutes of ......
  • In re Young's Estate
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • September 22, 1925
    ...court and does not pass by intestate succession; Blackburn v. State (Mont.) 152 P. 31; Grenshaw v. Moore (Tenn.) 137 S.W. 924; Smith v. State (Wis.) 155 N.W. 109; In Kennedy's Estate (Calif.) 108 P. 280; cases cited by plaintiff in error are governed by statutes differing from ours. While t......
  • Shepard v. State
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • March 12, 1924
    ...Among such may be mentioned State v. Thompson, 154 Wis. 320, 142 N. W. 647, 46 L. R. A. (N. S.) 790, Ann. Cas. 1915B, 1084;Smith v. State, 161 Wis. 588, 155 N. W. 109;Estate of Ebeling, 169 Wis. 432, 172 N. W. 734, 4 A. L. R. 1519; and Estate of Stephenson, 171 Wis. 452, 177 N. W. 579. As f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT