Smith v. United Const. Workers, 39521
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | NICHOLS |
| Citation | Smith v. United Const. Workers, 126 S.E.2d 307, 106 Ga.App. 87 (Ga. App. 1962) |
| Decision Date | 17 May 1962 |
| Docket Number | No. 39521,No. 2,39521,2 |
| Parties | Mrs. R. W. SMITH v. UNITED CONSTRUCTION WORKERS, etc., et al |
Syllabus by the Court
1. Service may be perfected upon an unincorporated organization by service upon a member of such organization who is employed by the president as a field representative to organize locals, solicit applications for membership, service such locals, handle grievances and aid in negotiating contracts, etc., under the supervision of a regional director who is also employed by such president.
2. While service may be perfected upon an unincorporated organization by serving an 'official member' of a branch or local, service cannot be perfected upon such an unincorporated organization by serving an 'official member' of a successor organization or an 'official member' of an organization that, at the time of service, has no connection with the organization sought to be served.
Mrs. Russell W. Smith sued United Construction Workers, District 50, United Mine Workers of America; District 50, United Mine Workers of America; and United Mine Workers of America to recover her damages resulting from the alleged willful and tortious acts of the defendants, their agents, employees and members in shooting her husband. The defendants traversed the entries of service of process and, after amendments had been filed to the returns of service and the separate traverses amended, the trial court, hearing the issue thus made without the intervention of a jury, sustained the traverse of each defendant and thereafter dismissed the petition because it appeared that no further service could be made on the defendants in Bibb County. The plaintiff assigns error on the judgments adverse to her.
Wilson, Branch & Barwick, Robert Thompson, Thomas S. Bentley, Lokey & Bowden, Hamilton Lokey, Glen Frick, Atlanta, Jones, Sparks, Benton & Cork; Frank Jones, Macon, for plaintiff in error.
Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis, A. David Kahn, James W. Dorsey, Atlanta, Martin, Snow, Grant & Napier, Cubbedge Snow, Macon, for defendant in error.
1. the first question to be dealt with is whether the person served as an 'official member' of District 50, United Mine Workers of America was a person authorized by the act of 1959 (Ga.L.1959, p. 44; Code Ann. § 3-117 et seq.), to receive service for such defendant. The person served was a member of such union and was an employee of such union (field representative), being appointed by the president of the union, and under the supervision of a regional director, also appointed by the president, worked as an organizer, took application for membership, serviced local unions, handled grievances and helped local unions negotiate contracts.
In Claycraft Co. v. United Mine Workers, 6 Cir., 204 F.2d 600, it was held that a regional director with duties similar to those of the person upon...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Sheet Metal Workers Intern. Ass'n v. Carter
...of the local who occupied a higher position in the union organization than the rank and file member. E. g., Smith v. United Construction Workers, 106 Ga.App. 87, 126 S.E.2d 307; American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO v. Rowe, 121 Ga.App. 99, 172 S.E.2d 866. Howe......
-
Sheet Metal Workers Intern. Ass'n v. Carter
...of State, County, and Municipal Employees v. Rowe, 121 Ga.App. 99(1), 172 S.E.2d 866 (1970), and in Smith v. United Construction Workers, 106 Ga.App. 87(1), 126 S.E.2d 307 (1962). In the former case, service was held proper upon the parent union where service was perfected on two officers o......
- Wright v. Lansdale Clothes, Inc., 39124
-
Masters v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Intern.
...any officer, or official member of any branch or local of such organization or association . . ." E. g., Smith v. United Construction Workers, 106 Ga.App. 87, 126 S.E.2d 307 (1962). It appears without contradiction that process was served, at the ALPA local office in Fulton County, upon an ......