Smith v. United States
Decision Date | 29 October 1924 |
Docket Number | No. 2267.,2267. |
Citation | 2 F.2d 715 |
Parties | SMITH v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Stanyarne Wilson, of Spartanburg, S. C.(Wilson & Wilson, of Rock Hill, S. C., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
Joseph A. Tolbert, U. S. Atty., of Greenville, S. C.(J. E. Marshall, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for the United States.
Before WOODS, WADDILL, and ROSE, Circuit Judges.
Defendant was convicted on an indictment containing two counts — the first charging unlawful possession, and the second unlawful transportation of "certain intoxicating liquors, to wit, 216 bottles of ginger, fit for use for beverage purposes."On the night of January 27, 1924, a deputy United States marshal and a state constable, under authority of a search warrant, searched the store and outbuildings on the premises known as the Porter place.The warrant directed the search of the premises and outbuildings of George Smith, John Doe, and others.The officers found men in and around the store who had been drinking, one of them having whisky in his pocket, and others having Jamaica ginger.
As the officers stepped out into the yard in the rear of the store building, F. D. Smith, the defendant, drove up in an automobile.When he alighted, Moss, the state constable, tapped him on the shoulder and spoke to him.Moss then walked around the back of the car to the opposite side, and noticed that the rear door was open.He turned his flashlight on the rear floor of the car and saw 216 bottles of Jamaica ginger, branded: "Lister, the deputy marshal, in the meantime had asked Smith what he had in the car.Moss, when he discovered the ginger,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
United States v. Callahan
...Haerr v. United States, 240 F.2d 533, 535 (5th Cir. 1957); Safarik v. United States, 62 F.2d 892, 895 (8th Cir. 1933); Smith v. United States, 2 F.2d 715 (4th Cir. 1924); Boyd v. United States, 286 F. 930 (4th Cir. 1923); United States v. Strickland, 62 F.Supp. 468, 471 (W.D.S.C. 12 United ......
-
State v. Halko
...looking through a window does not constitute an unreasonable search, Safarik v. United States, 8 Cir., 62 F.2d 892, 895; Smith v. United States, 4 Cir., 2 F.2d 715, 716; United States v. Strickland, D.C., 62 F.Supp. 468, 471; State v. Hawkins, 362 Mo. 152, 240 S.W.2d 688, 692-693; People v.......
-
Sweeting v. State
...F.2d 301 (9th Cir.); Petteway v. United States, 261 F.2d 53 (4 Cir.); United States v. O'Brien, 174 F.2d 341 (7th Cir.); Smith v. United States, 2 F.2d 715 (4th Cir.); United States v. Callahan, 256 F.Supp. 739 (D.Minn.); State v. Haggard, 80 Idaho 217, 404 P.2d 580; People v. Carnes, 173 C......
-
Chadwick v. State
...207 Miss. 868, 43 So.2d 571. To observe what is open and patent, in either sunlight or artificial light, is not a search. Smith v. United States, 4 Cir., 2 F.2d 715; United States v. Strickland, D.C., 62 F.Supp. 468; 79 C.J.S. Searches and Seizures § 1, p. In his third Assignment of Error, ......