Smyth v. United States Civil Service Commission
Decision Date | 20 September 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 65-C-333.,65-C-333. |
Citation | 291 F. Supp. 568 |
Parties | James P. SMYTH and Sheboygan County, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Alexander Hopp, Corp. Counsel, Sheboygan, Wis., for petitioners.
James B. Brennan, U. S. Atty., Milwaukee, Wis., for respondent.
DECISION and ORDER
The petitioner, James P. Smyth, was charged by the civil service commission with a violation of section 12(a) of the Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. § 118k (now 5 U.S.C. § 1502). The petitioner answered the charges, and the case was heard on April 13, 1965. On November 17, 1965, the commission issued its final report and order. The conclusion of that report read as follows:
"It is found that the respondent, James P. Smyth, was principally employed from March 11, 1964, to September 8, 1964, in connection with an activity financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States, that during this period he took an active part in political management or in political campaigns as charged, in violation of Section 12(a) of the Hatch Political Activities Act of 1939, as amended, and that the violation warrants removal from employment."
Mr. Smyth then petitioned this court for a review of the commission's determination under 5 U.S.C. § 118k (c) (now 5 U.S.C. § 1508). The civil service commission then filed a motion for summary judgment. The entire matter is now set for disposition, there being no issue of material fact although the parties dispute the implications of the facts.
The letter of charges issued by the commission alleged: that Mr. Smyth was the director of the Sheboygan county civil defense program; that this program was financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or by a federal agency; and that Mr. Smyth's position as civil defense director was at all relevant times his "principal employment". It was further charged that while so employed, Mr. Smyth "took an active part in political management or in political campaigns" in violation of the act. The specific acts complained of were that:
The petitioner admitted that the Sheboygan county civil defense program was financed in whole or in part by loans or grants by the United States or by a federal agency. He also admitted that he did each of the five acts alleged above. The first two acts occurred before June 1, 1964, at which time the position of civil defense director was changed from full to part-time. The last three acts occurred while Mr. Smyth was the part-time director.
Mr. Smyth claims that the commission's findings are erroneous in the following respects:
The court's review, therefore, is quite narrow; the commission's findings must be affirmed if they were "in accordance with law". State of Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service Commission, 330 U.S. 127, 67 S.Ct. 544, 91 L.Ed. 794 (1946); In re Ramshaw, 266 F.Supp. 73 (D. Idaho, 1967); Engelhardt v. United States Civil Service Comm., 197 F.Supp. 806 (D. Ala. 1961). The review extends to both questions of law and fact, but it is limited to an examination of the facts as found by the commission to determine whether the commission abused its discretion. Engelhardt v. United States Civil Service Comm., supra.
I conclude that the entire determination was in accordance with law and that there was no abuse of discretion.
Mr. Smyth became the full-time civil defense director on January 1, 1963. While the job remained a full-time position (prior to June 1, 1964), this was his principal employment. He contends that while the job was a full-time one, his activities did not violate the Hatch act.
In March, 1964, Mr. Smyth submitted a news release to radio station WKTS in Sheboygan, stating that it was his intention to seek the Republican nomination for county clerk. On the basis of that release, the station broadcast a news story concerning his candidacy on March 11, 1964. Further, on May 15, 1965, Mr. Smyth contracted with radio station WHBL in Sheboygan to have broadcast 40 radio spot announcements on behalf of his candidacy.
Mr. Smyth contends that these activities did not violate the act, and he testified that he did not really consider himself a candidate until sometime after June 1. He also testified that he made no attempt to perform what he termed any political action until the end of June.
Mr. Smyth argues that his announcement was a mere expression of an "intention" and that his reservation of radio time only gave him a cancellable right in the event that he did in fact become a candidate. In my opinion, the commission's determination that Mr. Smyth's activities prior to June 1, 1964 amounted to "an active part in political management or in political campaigns" was in accordance with law and not an abuse of discretion. The evidence before the commission substantiated this finding.
The petitioner urges that the commission erred in holding that...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Burke v. Bennett
...v. U.S. Civil Service Commission, 130 F.Supp. 15, 16-17 (D.N.J.1955), aff'd, 229 F.2d 435 (3rd Cir.1956); Smyth v. U.S. Civil Service Commission, 291 F.Supp. 568 (E.D.Wis. 1968)). Duke Bennett's job as the Director of Operations for the Hamilton Center is his principal The Hatch Act applies......
-
Swinney v. Untreiner
...806 (D.C.M.D.Ala.1961), aff'd. 304 F.2d 882 (C.A.5th 1962), (chairman of State Democratic Executive Committee);Smyth v. U.S. Civil Service Comm., 291 F.Supp. 568 (D.C.Wis.1968), (ran on Republican ticket for office of county clerk).6 403 U.S. 936, 91 S.Ct. 2254, 29 L.Ed.2d 717 (1971): 'Cert......
-
4.3 IV. To Whom Does It Apply?
...to which a he or she devotes the most time, and from which he or she derives the most income. See Smyth v. U.S. Civ. Serv. Comm’n, 291 F. Supp. 568 (E.D. Wis. 1968).[251] . See 5 U.S.C. § 1501(4).[252] . See Hatch Act Modernization Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-230, § 2, 126 Stat. 1616, 1616......