Snelling v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Decision Date | 03 March 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 25337.,25337. |
Citation | 780 N.W.2d 472,2010 SD 24 |
Parties | Kyla SNELLING, Appellant, v. SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, South Dakota Department of Human Services, Appellees. |
Court | South Dakota Supreme Court |
Dominic M. Smith, South Dakota Advocacy Services, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Attorney for appellant.
Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General, Laurie M. Bauer, Special Assistant Attorney General, Department of Human Services, Pierre, South Dakota, Attorneys for appellees.
¶ 1. Kyla Snelling (Kyla) appeals the circuit court's decision and order affirming the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) determination that Kyla was not eligible for services under a federally funded Medicaid waiver program for in-home/community-based services for the mentally retarded.1 Kyla also appeals the circuit court's decision affirming the ALJ's denial of reimbursement for a functional evaluation. We affirm.
¶ 2. Kyla is a sixteen-year-old young woman with Spinal Atrophy Type II, a degenerative muscular disease.2 Unable to walk or stand, she uses an electric wheelchair. Kyla is unable to use her arms to transfer to and from her wheelchair. She is also unable to bathe, dress her lower body, attend to her personal hygiene needs, use the bathroom, prepare her meals, shop, clean her home, or do any activities of daily living without help. Kyla is physically limited by her ability to lift only small and light objects to and from her lap to a low countertop or table. She has begun experiencing difficulty tipping her head back to drink and uses a straw to compensate. Kyla can feed herself, but requires help cutting solid foods. Her mother, who also cares for two other physically disabled children in the home, provides all of Kyla's care at home and transports her to all her activities. Her mother either uses an electric lift to transfer Kyla, or lifts her manually. Kyla's mother is the sole caregiver except while Kyla is at school.
¶ 3. Kyla has an IQ of 109, well within the normal range, and attends public high school in Sioux Falls with the help of an educational assistant. A Hoyer lift is used to transfer Kyla at school. Kyla is considered bright, social, and able to comport herself in school without any behavioral issues. Kyla is currently working on obtaining a driver's license; although she will require an adapted automobile after she is licensed to drive.
¶ 4. Kyla receives Supplemental Social Security Income (SSI) and services from a non-waiver family support program administered by the Department of Social Services (DSS) through Volunteers of America and funded exclusively with general state funds. The state-funded, non-waiver program is codified at SDCL chapter 27B-2. Services through the state-funded non-waiver program are limited to individuals with a developmental disability as defined at SDCL 27B-1-18, which provides:
(Emphasis added).
¶ 5. A second family support program managed by DSS, administered through a Medicaid waiver and funded with federal funds (Medicaid FS Waiver program), is available to qualified South Dakota residents. The Medicaid FS Waiver program is limited to individuals in need of and eligible for institutionalized services in an Intermediate Care Facility for People with Mental Retardation (ICF/MR) as provided by 42 C.F.R. § 440.150, but who could remain in their homes or in the community if services were available.
¶ 6. The Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 42, Section 440.150, contains the eligibility requirements for services and institutionalization in an ICF/MR, which also determine whether an individual may also qualify for the Medicaid FS Waiver program. It provides:
42 C.F.R. § 440.150. The Medicaid FS Waiver program's objective is to avoid placing a qualified individual in an ICF/MR if necessary services are available in the community. See 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(VI); 42 C.F.R. § 441.301(b)(1)(ii) and (iii)(B); 42 C.F.R. § 430.25(c)(2). An individual qualifies for placement in an ICF/MR under 42 C.F.R. § 435.1010, which defines "Persons with related conditions" as follows:
(Emphasis added).
¶ 7. South Dakota currently maintains one ICF/MR in Redfield, South Dakota. Services focus on the individual needs of each resident in the areas of S.D. Dep't of Human Services, http://dhs.sd. gov/sddc/about.aspx (last visited February 22, 2010).
¶ 8. The Centers for Medicaid and Medicare approved South Dakota's participation in the Medicaid FS Waiver program for home and community based services (HCBS). South Dakota Administrative Rules provide the qualifications for participation in the Medicaid FS Waiver program and mirror the federal requirements. An individual seeking to participate in the Medicaid FS Waiver program must meet the requirements of ARSD 67:54:04:04, which provides:
An individual may be eligible for the program if that person meets the requirements of ARSD 67:54:04:04, and the requirements of ARSD 67:54:04:03, which provides:
The individual must also satisfy the requirements of ARSD 67:54:04:05, which provides:
(Emphasis added). Finally, an individual qualified by virtue of having a developmental disability as defined by ARSD 67:54:04:05 must need the types of services offered in an ICF-MR by demonstrating a "substantial functional limitation" in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Davis v. Wharf Res. (USA), Inc.
...the correct prima facie elements of the wrongful discharge claim into the findings of fact and conclusions of law. Snelling v. S.D. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 2010 S.D. 24, ¶ 13, 780 N.W.2d 472, 478 (“We examine de novo all questions of law, as well as documentary evidence contained in the recor......
-
Royal v. Reese
...persons.” See 42 C.F.R. § 435.1010(a)(2).The Court's analysis is consistent with the reasoning in Snelling v. South Dakota Department of Social Services, 780 N.W.2d 472 (S.D.2010), the only reported decision to have addressed the applicability of 42 C.F.R. § 435.1010(a)(2) to conditions res......
-
Matthews v. S.D. Dep't of Soc. Servs. (In re Pooled Advocate Trust)
...requires this Court to give great weight to the findings made and inferences drawn by an agency on questions of fact.” Snelling v. S.D. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 2010 S.D. 24, ¶ 13, 780 N.W.2d 472, 477. We will reverse an agency's decision only if it is “clearly erroneous in light of the entire......
- Repp v. Van Someren