Snider v. Alabama Power Co.
Decision Date | 03 June 1977 |
Citation | 346 So.2d 946 |
Parties | J. H. SNIDER et al. v. ALABAMA POWER COMPANY. SC 1928. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
John R. Phillips for Phillips & Watson, Anniston, for appellants.
H. Hampton Boles for Balch, Bingham, Baker, Hawthorne, Williams & Ward, Birmingham, for appellee.
This is an appeal from a final decree entered in favor of appellee, Alabama Power Company, against appellants, J. H. Snider, Gartice Snider, H. M. Fagan, Jr., Leola Fagan, and Mrs. W. E. Thompson. We affirm.
On September 8, 1972, Alabama Power Company filed a bill of complaint in the circuit court of Calhoun County, in equity, against appellants, seeking to enjoin them from interfering with Alabama Power's electric transmission line easement and to require appellants to remove a commercial building from the easement. It is undisputed that appellants constructed, in 1972, and presently maintain and own, the building in question, and that this building is situated directly under Alabama Power's 44,000 volt transmission line.
Alabama Power claims ownership of the right of way through a 1915 deed and, alternatively through prescription. By instrument, dated September 16, 1915, Thomas Owens conveyed a transmission line easement to Alabama Power over and across the following land in Calhoun County:
Appellants point out, however, that the property description contained in the 1915 deed shows the easement to be in the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 5, Township 15, Range 8 East, whereas in paragraph 5 of Alabama Power's complaint, the easement is shown to be in the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 5, Township 15 South, Range 8 East. Even though the description in the 1915 conveyance recites that the lot is in the "NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Sec. 5 . . .," Alabama Power contends that the numerous exhibits and testimony introduced during the trial below establish that the correct description of the lot was located in the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 5.
The trial court, after hearing the evidence ore tenus, ruled in favor of Alabama Power and ordered appellants to remove the building from Alabama Power's right of way. The final decree of the lower court reads, in pertinent part:
The basic issue to be determined is whether there is sufficient evidence to support the lower court's finding that Alabama Power acquired an easement or right of way across the property of the appellants by deed or prescription, and if so, does the appellants' use of the servient estate interfere with the Alabama Power's use of the right of way?
Alabama Power concedes that the description in the 1915 deed contains two incorrect designations. The two errors contained in the description are:
(1) The description recites that the lot is in the NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Sec. 5, when in fact,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Western Massachusetts Elec. Co. v. Sambo's of Massachusetts, Inc.
...increased difficulty of repair, or both. Collins v. Alabama Power Co., 214 Ala. 643, 645, 108 So. 868 (1926); Snider v. Alabama Power Co., 346 So.2d 946, 949-950 (Ala.1977). Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. Minnette, 115 Cal.App.2d 698, 706, 252 P.2d 642 (1953). Georgia Power Co. v. Sullivan, 217......
-
Jackson v. City of Auburn
...of its employees, that the easement has a width of 30 feet and extends from the ground to the sky. See, generally, Snider v. Alabama Power Co., 346 So.2d 946, 949 (Ala.1977) (explaining that when no description of a right-of-way is available, the easement holder is entitled to "a reasonable......
-
Jackson v. City of Auburn, No. 2031010 (AL 6/24/2005)
...Co. v. Berry, 222 Ala. 20, 24, 130 So. 541, 544 (1930). In addition, APCo argues that, under the law pronounced in Snider v. Alabama Power Co., 346 So. 2d 946, 949 (Ala. 1977), it is entitled to an easement that has a width of 30 feet and that extends from the ground to the sky. Such an exp......
-
Alabama Power Co. v. Drummond
...acts interfering with or inconsistent with the proper enjoyment of an easement by the owner of the dominant estate. Snider v. Alabama Power Co., 346 So.2d 946 (Ala.1977); Alabama Power Co. v. Martin, 341 So.2d 695 Alabama Power Company has the right to flood each square foot of the property......