Snider v. Carmichael

Decision Date28 May 1936
Docket Number7518.
Citation58 P.2d 1004,102 Mont. 387
PartiesSNIDER v. CARMICHAEL.
CourtMontana Supreme Court

Rehearing Denied June 29, 1936.

Appeal from District Court, Fergus County; Stanley E. Felt, Judge.

Suit by Ray Snider against E. W. Carmichael. From an adverse decree defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

C. W Robison and Belden & DeKalb, all of Lewistown, for appellant.

E. K Cheadle, of Lewistown, and George E. Hurd, of Great Falls, for respondent.

MORRIS Justice.

This is an action to terminate a contract between the parties, for an accounting, and for a division of assets, or the sale of the assets and division of the proceeds thereof.

For several years prior to November 1, 1930, the defendant was the owner of several bands of sheep which were let to various parties in Fergus and adjoining counties to be run on shares. One band was let to the plaintiff. On November 1, 1930, the defendant owned and had let out approximately 11,000 sheep, all breeding ewes except 1,600 ewe lambs, and on that date the plaintiff and defendant entered into the contract hereafter recited and referred to as Exhibit A of the complaint. The contract provided that the business should be carried on for one year and might be continued by mutual agreement for an additional year. The record does not show that the additional year was expressly agreed to on the termination of the year covered by the contract, but the business was continued without change until April 1, 1933, at which time the second contract, Exhibit B of the complaint, hereafter recited, was agreed upon, but was not executed until July 29, 1933.

The contracts, being the best evidence of the intention of the parties, are set out in full, as follows:

"Exhibit A.
Agreement.
This Agreement made and entered into in duplicate this 1st day of November, A. D. 1930, by and between E. W. Carmichael of Lewistown, Montana, the party of the first part and Ray Snider of Lewistown, Montana, the party of the second part Witnesseth:
The party of the first part for and in consideration of the covenants and conditions herein contained has agreed to sell and the party of the second part for and in consideration of the covenants and conditions herein contained has agreed to buy an undivided one-half interest in all of the sheep now owned by the party of the first part upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.
The sheep now owned by the party of the first part are more particularly described as follows: [The list of names of persons to whom the sheep were let and the number in possession of each is omitted, the total having been mentioned above.]
All bucks belonging to the first party which have been and may hereafter be delivered to any and all of the various parties to whom sheep have been delivered under the various contracts hereinbefore mentioned.
All of said sheep branded with a black paint cross on the back and all sheep hereafter acquired by the parties hereto and the increase of said sheep hereinabove mentioned to bear the same brand.
It is mutually agreed between the parties hereto that the party of the first part agrees to sell and the party of the second part agrees to buy an undivided one-half interest in the sheep now out on the various contracts hereinabove mentioned subject to all of the terms, provisions and conditions of each of the said contracts hereinabove mentioned.
The party of the second part agrees to pay for the said interest in all of said sheep the sum of Forty-five thousand three hundred and 50/100 ($45,340.50) Dollars, payable one year from the date hereof, bearing interest at the rate of eight (8) per cent. However, it is mutually agreed that all moneys received from the sale of wool, sheep or lambs, prior to the date of maturity of said purchase price, shall be divided and the one-half part of the receipts from such sources which would belong to the party of the second part shall be applied in payment of any advances made by the party of the first part to the party of the second part, the interest on the purchase price and upon the purchase price. Said receipts to be applied in the order herein mentioned.
The party of the second part agrees to furnish one-half of the necessary expenses for the care of the said sheep and in the event of his inability to furnish one-half of the necessary expenses, the party of the first part agrees to make such advances and if necessary, to provide the party of the second part with the necessary living expenses. All of which sums are to be treated as advances and paid as herein mentioned.
It is mutually agreed by the parties hereto that a settlement shall be made following the first of each and every month, and all advances and receipts from the sale of sheep and wool during the preceding month and the exact conditions existing between the parties determined as of the date of the said first of each and every month.
It is mutually agreed that each of the parties are to contribute equally to the expenses of the care and maintenance, market and otherwise handling of the sheep hereinabove mentioned, except, however, that such expenses as are herein mentioned which under the terms of the various contracts hereinbefore mentioned between the party of the first part herein and the third parties are to be borne only in accordance with the terms, provisions and conditions of the contracts.
It is further mutually agreed that the title to all of said sheep now owned by the party of the first part, or any sheep acquired by exchange, substitution or purchase shall be and remain in and the property of the party of the first part until such time as the purchase price hereinabove expressed, together with the interest thereon and any advances made have been paid, satisfied and discharged.
It is further mutually agreed that in the event of the death of either party hereto within one year of the date hereof, that the sheep now owned by the party of the first part, and the subject matter of this contract, shall be sold and one-half of the sale price so received to be paid to the party of the first part and so much of the other one-half of the same price so received as is necessary to pay the purchase price here expressed, interest thereon and advances paid to the party of the first part, or his executors, administrators or assigns and the balance paid to the party of the second part, his executors, administrators or assigns.
It is further mutually agreed that it is the intention of the parties hereto that in the event the handling of the sheep during the year commencing November 1, 1930, and ending November 1, 1931, is mutually satisfactory to the parties hereto to continue a like arrangement for one further year, provided, however, that this provision shall not be an option on the part of either party, but in order to make the contract operative for another year it must be mutually agreed upon by the parties hereto.
It is further mutually agreed that any sheep which may be received by trade or exchange for any sheep, the subject matter of this contract, shall be held subject to the provisions herein.
It is further mutually agreed that neither party to this contract shall sell or assign his interest therein without the consent of the other party first had and obtained in writing.
In Witness Whereof, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals on the day and year herein first above written.
(Acknowledgment.)
E. W. Carmichael [Seal.]
Ray Snider [Seal.]"
"Exhibit B.
Agreement.
This agreement, made and entered into in duplicate this 1st day of April, A. D. 1933, by and between E. W. Carmichael, of Lewistown, Montana, the party of the first part, and Ray Snider, of Lewistown, Montana, the party of the second part, Witnesseth:
That party of the first part hereby agrees to sell and transfer, to the party of the second part, and the party of the second part agrees to buy from the party of the first part, an undivided one-half interest in Sixteen Thousand (16,000) sheep, ranging in ages from one to five years respectively, including Three Hundred (300) rams, for the sum of 43,000 Forty Three Thousand Dollars, and which said sheep are now on the range in the counties of Garfield and Fergus, Montana, and all of which said sheep are branded with black cross on back, and together with increase during the life of this contract, shall be at all times so branded.
It is mutually covenanted and agreed by and between the parties hereto that each of the parties hereto shall contribute equally to the care, maintenance, grazing, running, handling, shearing and marketing of said sheep, and any and all other expenses incident to running and handling said sheep, and in the event that party of the second part is unable to advance his portion of the expenses incident to running and handling said sheep, then party of the first part will advance such money as may be required for expenses, with the portion thereof chargeable to second party to be repaid to first party out of the sale of wool and lambs; and it is further expressly agreed that party of the second part shall not acquire an interest in any other sheep or become interested in or own any other sheep except by and with the consent of the party of the first part first obtained in writing.
It is further covenanted and agreed by and between the parties hereto that Five Thousand (5,000) head of the said sheep are subject to two certain mortgages formerly obtained upon same, one by Herschel Carmichael, of Delphia, Montana, mortgage securing a note in the amount of Six Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($6,500.00) and the other securing a note in the amount of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) given to Ray Snider, the party of the second part herein, each of said chattel mortgages running to the Regional
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Rae v. Cameron
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1941
    ... ... generally asserted that they are governed by the same rules ...          This ... same authority was quoted in Snider v. Carmichael, ... 102 Mont. 387, 407, 58 P.2d 1004, where this court had under ... consideration an agreement between the parties relative to ... ...
  • Midland Development Co. v. Cove Irr. Dist.
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1936
  • Beedle v. Carolan
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • April 12, 1944
    ... ... Central Life Ins. Co. v. Jensen, 74 Mont. 70, 76, 237 P ... 518; Brown v. Homesteak Exploration Co., 98 Mont ... 305, 326, 39 P.2d 168; Snider v. Carmichael, 102 ... Mont. 387, 409, 58 P.2d 1004 ...          Proceeding ... under the rule laid down in the foregoing cases, it ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT