Snow Economics, Inc. v. Topgun Snow Making Systems, Inc.

Decision Date25 September 2014
Docket NumberAppeal 2014-007486
PartiesSNOW ECONOMICS, INC. Requester, Respondent v. TOPGUN SNOW MAKING SYSTEMS, INC.[1]Patent Owner, Appellant Inter Partes Reexamination Control 95/001, 961 Patent U.S. 6, 547, 157 B2 Technology Center 3900
CourtPatent Trial and Appeal Board
FILING DATE: 04/11/2012

Before STEVEN D.A. McCARTHY, DANIEL S. SONG and BRETT C. MARTIN Administrative Patent Judges.

DECISION ON APPEAL

SONG Administrative Patent Judge.

Claims 1-30 of the '157 patent are subject to reexamination and stand rejected (Right of Appeal Notice[3] (hereinafter "RAN") 1). The '157 patent issued with claims 1 and 2, and claims 3-30 were newly added during the reexamination. The Patent Owner appeals under 35 U.S.C §§ 134(b) and 315 from the Examiner's rejections with respect to all of the rejected claims (App. Br. 3). In addition to its Appeal Brief, the Patent Owner relies on its Rebuttal Brief (hereinafter "Reb. Br.") in support of patentability. The Requester relies on its Respondent Brief (hereinafter "Resp. Br.") in support of the Examiner's rejections. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134(b) and 315.

We AFFIRM.

The '157 patent is directed to a method for making snow (Abstract). Independent claim 1 is illustrative and reads as follows (App'x A):

1. (Amended) A method for making snow, the method comprising:
providing a plurality of air discharge nozzles and a plurality of water discharge nozzles mounted on a discharge unit of a tower snow gun; and
supplying pressurized water and pressurized air to at least one inlet of a control mechanism through at least one conduit extending from a bottom end of the tower snow gun and connecting the control mechanism to a supply of the pressurized air and a supply of the pressurized water;
controlling a ratio of water to air discharged from the discharge unit by selectively controlling discharge [of a supply] the of pressurized water and [a supply of] the pressurized air from the plurality of discharge nozzles by selecting at least one discharge nozzle from the plurality of discharge nozzles, comprising:
opening at least one first outlet of a plurality of outlets of [a] the control mechanism;
closing at least one second outlet of the plurality of outlets, the at least one second outlet located between the top end of the gun and the bottom end of the gun; and
whereby at least one of the [supply of] pressurized water and the [supply of] pressurized air is discharged through the at least one discharge nozzle of the plurality of discharge nozzles.
The Examiner rejects various claims as follows:
1. Claims 3-24 rejected as enlarging the scope of the claims of the '157 patent.[4]
2. Claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 22 and 26 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as indefinite.
3. Claims 1 and 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Kircher '061[5] in view of Tropeano[6] as taught by Kircher 769.[7]
4. Claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Kircher '769.
5. Claims 3-30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Kircher '061 in view of Tropeano as taught by Kircher 769.
6. Claims 19-30 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Kircher 769.
7. Claims 3-30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Kircher 769.
ISSUES

The following issues have been raised in the present appeal.[8]

1. Whether the Examiner erred in finding that claims 1, 2 and 26 are indefinite.

2. Whether the Examiner erred in concluding that the claims 1, 2 and 25-30 would have been obvious over Kircher '061 in view of Tropeano as taught by Kircher 769.

3. Whether the Examiner erred in concluding that claims 1 and 25-30 would have been obvious over Kircher 769.

4. Whether the Examiner erred in finding claims 25-30 are anticipated by Kircher 769.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The record supports the following findings of fact (FF) by a preponderance of the evidence. 1. Kircher'061:

A. Discloses a "method and apparatus for making and depositing artificial snow, " the apparatus including annular water manifold 12, which is connected via water line 12a to a source of pressurized water, and plurality of nozzles 13 supported on water manifold 12, nozzles 13 being adjustable by throttle valves 14 to provide water spray (Abst.; col. 3, ll. 28-43; Fig. 2).
B. Discloses that the apparatus also includes annular compressed-air manifold 15, which is connected via compressed air line 15a to a source of compressed air, and plurality of nozzles 16 mounted on and connected to compressed-air manifold 15, nozzles 16 being adjustable by throttle valves 17 to provide high velocity air stream 19 (col. 3, ll. 44-56; Fig. 2).
C. Teaches adjusting the ratio of compressed air to water, stating:
Of course, when conditions are favorable for making artificial snow, as when the temperature and the humidity are low, and high pressure air can be shut off or cut down by reducing the number of nozzles 16 in operation and good quality snow will still result merely from the mixture of water spray 18 into the high volume low pressure main air stream. As conditions worsen for producing artificial snow, additional air jets 13 can be cut into operation by manipulation of handle 17' of valve 17 while the snow-making machine continues in operation.

(Col. 6, ll. 42-53).

D. Teaches, with respect to an alternative embodiment, that:
By adjusting the ratio of the compressed air an [sic, and] pressurized water fed to seeding and air-spray nozzle 30 and seeding nozzle 31, optimum results may be readily obtained under varying ambient conditions.

(Col. 5, ll. 28-31).

E. Discloses an alternative embodiment with three-way valving arrangement to allow conversion of one or more air nozzles to water nozzles to provide a "supercharging" feature described as follows:
Another advantage of the paired three-way valving arrangement of FIGS. 7-9 is that it will enable high pressure water to be supplied to any selected number of air nozzles to convert them to water nozzles when conditions are very favorable to making snow; i.e., at very low temperature and humidity conditions when snow can be made with maximum discharge of water and a minimum amount of dispersion of water particles. This "supercharging" feature further augments the flexibility of the apparatus of the invention to meet a wide variety of snow-making conditions.
This "supercharging" configuration is shown in FIG. 10 wherein water three-way valve 74 remains in the normal operating position discussed above with reference to FIG. 7 but air three-way valve 70 is rotated 90° clockwise from the normal operating position so that the high pressure water in cross-over conduit 72 is fed to nozzle 16 by means of throats 78 and 80 and so that throat 76 is blocked. In this configuration water spray 18 exiting nozzle 12 and a secondary water spray 90 exiting nozzle 16 intersect at a point remote from the respective nozzles.

(Col. 8, ll. 33-54; see Figs. 7-10).

2. Tropeano:
A. Discloses a method and apparatus for making snow including snowmaking nozzle apparatus S with plurality of snowmaking nozzles N1-N4 mounted to manifold 40, the nozzles discharging compressed air and water mixed together (col. 3, ll. 20-41; col. 4, ll. 18-24, 54-64; col. 5, ll. 3-8; Figs. 1, 5).
B. Discloses that snowmaking nozzles N1-N4 are provided with compressed air and pressurized water by compressed air pipes A and water pipes W connected thereto via various intervening components including inlets 16, 18, elbows 20, 22, couplings 21, 23, outlets 24, 26, conduit member 25, fitting member 12 with conduit sections 12a, 12b, extensions 40a, 40b, couplings 43, 44, and tubular connecting parts 50, 52, 54 (col. 3, ll. 20-32; col. 3, 64-col. 4, 1. 36; Figs. 1, 3-5).
C. Discloses that snowmaking nozzle apparatus S is supported on tower structure T (col. 3, ll. 52-56; Fig. 1).
3. Kircher769:
A. Discloses snow making tower 50 including plurality of sub-booms 120, 122, 124 having plurality of water spray atomizing nozzles N1-N3, and air manifold end cap 104 having plurality of air jet orifices 140, 142, 144 (col. 14, ll. 27-34, 61-66; col. 16, ll. 5-10; Figs. 1, 3-6).
B. Discloses that the teachings in Kircher '061 have been applied to known prior art tower snow guns, and states:
The foregoing "water supercharging" feature of the Kircher '061 patent was also subsequently applied to a rotatable and pivotable (universally manually adjustable) tower-supported snow gun array in the Troepano et al [sic, Tropeano et al] U.S. Pat. No. 3, 964, 682. Likewise, in the Dupre U.S. Pat. No. 5, 004, 151 [, ] this water "supercharging" principle was applied to the earlier Dupre '825 patent['s] external mix snow tower apparatus by providing additional water nozzles oriented to spray convergently into the ambient plume generated by paired air and water nozzles arrayed at the upper end of the snow tower.

(Col. 6, ll. 37-47; see also col. 4, ll. 41-49).

PRINCIPLES OF LAW

"The combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results." KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 415-16 (2007). Ifatechnique has been used to improve one device and a person of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that it would improve similar devices in the same way, using the technique is obvious unless its actual application is beyond his or her skill. Id. at 417. "A person of ordinary skill is also a person of ordinary creativity, not an automaton." Id. at 421. In addition, in considering the scope and content of the prior art, "it is proper to take into account not only specific teachings of the reference but also the inferences which one skilled in the art would reasonably be expected to draw therefrom." In re Preda, 401 F.2d 825, 826 (CCPA 1968).

ANALY...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT