Snow v. Deerfield Township

Decision Date01 April 1875
Citation78 Pa. 181
PartiesSnow <I>et al. versus</I> Deerfield Township.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Before AGNEW, C. J., SHARSWOOD, MERCUR, GORDON, PAXSON and WOODWARD, JJ.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Warren county: Of January Term 1874, No. 344 R. Brown, for plaintiffs in error.—Notwithstanding the railroad company were bound to construct a road to supply the place of that occupied by the railroad, yet it was the duty of the road commissioners to see that it was done: Penna. Railroad v. Dusquesne Borough, 10 Wright 223. The township would be liable for any injury arising from obstructions to the road: Phœnixville v. Phœnix Iron Co., 9 Id. 135. The subsequent legal laying out of the road ratified the prior acts of the commissioners: Angell & Ames on Corp., sect. 304; 2 Dillon's Mun. Corp., sect. 385, note 1; Allegheny v. McClurkan, 2 Harris 81; 1 Parsons on Contracts 139; 1 Hilliard on Contracts 551: McLain v. Snyder School District, 2 Jones 204; Hart v. Borough of Girard, 6 P. F. Smith 26; Kelsey v. National Bank, 19 Id. 426; Wright v. Burbank, 14 Id. 247; Klopp v. Witmoyer, 7 Wright 226.

S. P. Johnson, for defendant in error.—The commissioners could not alter the location of the road except by a new view: Furniss v. Furniss, 5 Casey 15; Clark v. Commonwealth, 9 Id. 112; Morrow v. Commonwealth, 12 Wright 305; even to correct a mistake in opening the road in the wrong place: McMurtrie v. Stewart, 9 Harris 323; Holden v. Cole, 1 Barr 303. A road cannot be opened till after the final confirmation: Middle Creek Road, 9 Barr 69. A township is not liable for work done without authority, however beneficial the work: Anderson v. Hamilton, 1 Casey 75. The township could not ratify an unauthorized and illegal expenditure of public road funds: Rapho v. Moore, 18 P. F. Smith 404; Grafins v. Commonwealth, 3 Penna. R. 502.

Judgment was entered in the Supreme Court, April 1st 1875,

PER CURIAM.

The agreement of the 23d of August 1867, between the township of Deerfield and The Warren & Franklin Railroad Company, was not a mere substitution of W. W. Connelly and John Robinson as agents for the company to exercise its powers in making the road in question to supply the place of that occupied by the company. It was much more; it was an agreement by the township wholly to release the railroad company from all responsibility and liability for the construction and repair of this and all other roads made necessary by the obstructions, or occupancy, or injury caused by the building of the railroad, and to perform this duty on part of the township. Now, clearly this was a contract beyond the scope of the powers of the commissioners who made the agreement on behalf of the township. They could not...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State ex rel. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company v. Public Service Commission
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 30, 1917
    ... ... sec. 1056; 3 Elliott, Railroads, sec. 1105; 1 Elliott, Roads ... and Streets, 48; Snow v. Deerfield Township, 78 Pa ... 181; Newton v. Railroad, 66 Iowa 422; State ex ... rel. v ... ...
  • Minneapolis, St. P., R. & D. Elec. Traction Co. v. City of Minneapolis
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • February 27, 1914
    ...without consideration. The rights here concerned are rights of the public which the officers of the city cannot barter away. Snow v. Deerfield Township, 78 Pa. 181;City of Newton v. C., R. I. & Pac. Ry. Co., 66 Iowa, 422, 23 N. W. 905. A contract by which a municipality undertakes to assume......
  • Buffalo, N. Y. & P. R. Co. v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • May 25, 1888
    ... ... a certain public road and highway in Glade township, Warren ... county, Pennsylvania, leading from the borough of Warren ... along the bank of the ... exclusively upon the railroad company: Snow v. Deerfield ... Tp., 78 Pa. 181; Penn. R. Co. v. Irwin, 85 Pa ... 336. The road ... ...
  • Pittsburg & West End Passenger Ry. v. Point Bridge Co.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • November 13, 1894
    ...(plaintiff) from its liability to make compensation. Any act of the municipal authorities to that end would be clearly ultra vires: Snow v. Twp., 78 Pa. 181; Phillips R.R., 78 Pa. 177. The necessity which will permit one corporation to take the franchise of another must be absolute: Pittsbu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT