Society to Oppose Pornography, Inc. v. Thevis
Decision Date | 20 February 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 5300,5300 |
Citation | 273 So.2d 653 |
Parties | SOCIETY TO OPPOSE PORNOGRAPHY, INC. v. Michael G. THEVIS, Robert Di Bernardo, et al. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
Donald F. De Boisblanc and Charles C. Foti, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.
Michael Silvers, New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.
Before REGAN, REDMANN, and BOUTALL, JJ.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, Society To Oppose Pornography, Inc., and against defendants Eros Cinema, Inc ., Michael G. Thevis, and Robert Di Bernardo. The judgment decreed that the defendants are guilty of maintaining a public nuisance of obscenity and directs the closing and padlocking of the premises known as 941 Decatur Street, New Orleans, Louisiana, operated under the name of Eros Cinema, Inc., d/b/a Les Banque Cinema Fantastique.
The judgment further decreed that a writ of injunction be issued without bond, perpetually enjoining, prohibiting, and restraining defendants from maintaining or carrying on or permitting the practice of obscenity upon the premises at 941 Decatur Street, or elsewhere in the State of Louisiana. The judgment was rendered in accordance with the provisions of LSA-R.S. 13:4711 through 13:4717.
From this adverse judgment, the defendants sought an appeal to this court and requested the trial court to suspend the injunctions granted. The trial court refused to suspend the injunctions and granted a devolutive appeal. Thereupon the defendants applied to this court for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus. A Writ of Certiorari was granted directing the record to be furnished us '* * * to the end that the validity of the proceedings may be ascertained'. A full hearing was had on all issues in the case just as if a regular appeal had been granted. Society To Oppose Pornography, Inc. v. Thevis, 255 So.2d 876 (La.App .4th Cir., 1971).
As is clearly shown in the decision of the court, together with the dissent, all of the issues raised in the case were decided therein. We quote the following pertinent language:
Following this decision, rehearing was requested and application for Certiorari or Writ of Review was taken to the Supreme Court on February 11, 1972. This application was refused. Society To Oppose Pornography, Inc. v. Thevis, 260 La. 706, 257 So.2d 158 (1972).
Our judgment on the writ has now become final. Rule XII Section 9 of the Uniform Rules of The Courts of Appeal in and for the State of Louisiana states as follows:
The rule is based in part on the case of Pelloat v. Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission, 175 So.2d 656 (La.App.1st Cir., 1965), writ refused, 248 La. 122, 176 So.2d 452 (1965). In Pelloat the Court of Appeal had granted a writ of certiorari and disposed of the matter following a hearing on a rule nisi. In refusing writs the Supreme Court stated:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jahncke Service, Inc. v. Zamo, Inc.
...judgments which have already been set aside by this court under its supervisory jurisdiction. (Compare Society to Oppose Pornography v. Thevis, La.App. 4 Cir. 1973, 273 So.2d 653.) Appeals ...