Sofia v. Sofia

Decision Date18 June 1990
CitationSofia v. Sofia, 556 N.Y.S.2d 778, 162 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
PartiesMichael SOFIA, Appellant, v. Jeanne SOFIA, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Willard H. DaSilva, Garden City (Richard J. Keidel, of counsel), for appellant.

Moran & Brodrick, Garden City (Robert A. Moran, of counsel), for respondent.

Before THOMPSON, J.P., and BROWN, EIBER and MILLER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the petitioner husband appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Balkin, J.), entered October 4, 1988, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Bannon, H.E.), dated July 11, 1988, which denied his application for a downward modification of his maintenance and child support obligations pursuant to a separation agreement.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the husband's contention, we find that he did not demonstrate a "material" adverse change in his financial circumstances sufficient, pursuant to the terms of the parties' separation agreement, to warrant a downward modification of his maintenance and child support obligations. Although the record establishes that he lost his position as a financial analyst in September 1987, he continued to receive semimonthly severance payments...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Taylor v. Taylor
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 12, 2011
    ...v. Sand, 290 A.D.2d 451, 452, 736 N.Y.S.2d 102; Matter of Westwater v. Donnelly, 204 A.D.2d 467, 468, 612 N.Y.S.2d 58; Sofia v. Sofia, 162 A.D.2d 594, 556 N.Y.S.2d 778). Accordingly, the defendant failed to demonstrate that continued enforcement of his obligation to pay maintenance under th......
  • In the Matter of Debbie Levine–seidman v. Seidman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 18, 2011
    ...of Talty v. Talty, 42 A.D.3d at 547, 840 N.Y.S.2d 114; see also Taylor v. Taylor, 83 A.D.3d 815, 920 N.Y.S.2d 419; Sofia v. Sofia, 162 A.D.2d 594, 556 N.Y.S.2d 778). Moreover, he failed to show that his ability to provide support had changed during that time ( see Basile v. Wiggs, 82 A.D.3d......
  • Keller v. Keller
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 18, 1996
    ...obligation (see, e.g., Matter of Ross v. Dittmar, supra; Matter of Zaccagnino v. Sisca, supra; Vant v. Vant, supra; Sofia v. Sofia, 162 A.D.2d 594, 556 N.Y.S.2d 778; Petraglia v. Petraglia, 110 A.D.2d 760, 488 N.Y.S.2d O'BRIEN, J.P., and THOMPSON, JOY and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur. ...
  • Brancoveanu v. Brancoveanu
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 18, 1991
    ...which necessitates a reduction in the award of child support (see, Praeger v. Praeger, 162 A.D.2d 671, 557 N.Y.S.2d 394; Sofia v. Sofia, 162 A.D.2d 594, 556 N.Y.S.2d 778; Matter of Cohen v. Seletsky, 142 A.D.2d 111, 534 N.Y.S.2d 688; Scagnelli v. Scagnelli, 127 A.D.2d 754, 512 N.Y.S.2d 146)......
  • Get Started for Free